BUR #41715 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias medea_(bestia_del_sol)_(fate) -> medea_lily_(bestia_del_sol)_(fate)
create alias medea_(witches'_kitchen)_(fate) -> medea_lily_(witches'_kitchen)_(fate)
Consistency.
Posted under Tags
BUR #41715 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias medea_(bestia_del_sol)_(fate) -> medea_lily_(bestia_del_sol)_(fate)
create alias medea_(witches'_kitchen)_(fate) -> medea_lily_(witches'_kitchen)_(fate)
Consistency.
BUR #41740 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication last_episode -> fate/stay_night
Didn't realize we had a tag for this.
The bulk update request #41598 (forum #357815) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #41600 (forum #357818) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #41649 (forum #357952) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #41669 (forum #358031) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #41715 (forum #358181) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
Ylimegirl said:
BUR #41740 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication last_episode -> fate/stay_night
Didn't realize we had a tag for this.
This should get a qualifier.
The bulk update request #41740 (forum #358259) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
BUR #41741 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias last_episode -> last_episode_(fate)
Rejoice, qualifier be upon ye
The bulk update request #41741 (forum #358269) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
BUR #41954 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication gray_(event_portrait)_(fate) -> gray_(fate)
Obvious implication is obvious.
BUR #41996 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication medusa_(prisma_illya) -> medusa_(rider)_(fate)
Alternate form of her from Prisma Illya, I didn't name the tag else I would have named it in line with the one I made for Medea's form from it.
BUR #41997 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias medea_(corrupted_hero)_(fate) -> medea_(prisma_illya)
Witch-Hunter-Siegfried said:
Alternate form of her from Prisma Illya, I didn't name the tag else I would have named it in line with the one I made for Medea's form from it.
IMO Medea's tag should be moved to match the others (Archer (Prisma Illya) and Cu Chulainn (Prisma Illya)). you should also know how to alias tags if you disagree with the name if you've been making BURs for this long...
Ylimegirl said:
BUR #41997 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias medea_(corrupted_hero)_(fate) -> medea_(prisma_illya)
IMO Medea's tag should be moved to match the others (Archer (Prisma Illya) and Cu Chulainn (Prisma Illya)). you should also know how to alias tags if you disagree with the name if you've been making BURs for this long...
Truthfully I didn’t think it was that relevant, was just musing.
BUR #42034 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication elizabeth_bathory_(pure_artist)_(fate) -> elizabeth_bathory_(fate)
Obvious is obvious, Posted it in the wrong thread for a second lol.
Witch-Hunter-Siegfried said:
BUR #42034 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication elizabeth_bathory_(pure_artist)_(fate) -> elizabeth_bathory_(fate)
Obvious is obvious, Posted it in the wrong thread for a second lol.
Next time please don't make a wiki with zero information if you don't know what you're writing about. Sincerely, the person who created the tag, was planning to create a wiki for the tag, and is updating most other wikis for FGO tags.
Ylimegirl said:
Next time please don't make a wiki with zero information if you don't know what you're writing about. Sincerely, the person who created the tag, was planning to create a wiki for the tag, and is updating most other wikis for FGO tags.
Makes sense, the reason I do this occasionally is due to Implications requiring wiki page and if I don't know the exact specificity I'll just write in a placeholder (tried looking up the exact context to no avail)
Witch-Hunter-Siegfried said:
Makes sense, the reason I do this occasionally is due to Implications requiring wiki page and if I don't know the exact specificity I'll just write in a placeholder (tried looking up the exact context to no avail)
If you don't know what the context is then don't submit the implication either??? I'm not sure what's not clicking. If you don't know the context then it isn't actually "obvious" to you now is it?
I feel like I need to stress I literally only created this tag today, just a few hours ago. Not everything needs to be implicated immediately. In fact I specifically haven't been implying most of the new costume tags I've been making yet specifically because I want to let NNTBot explode as it tries to figure out wtf's going on do them in big batches for the same character at the same time, once I'm all done back-tagging the old costumes.
Updated by Ylimegirl
Ylimegirl said:
If you don't know what the context is then don't submit the implication either??? I'm not sure what's not clicking. If you don't know the context then it isn't actually "obvious" to you now is it?
I actually disagree, if it's a costume tag like this it is obvious that an implication is needed even to someone with no understanding of the franchise. The only issue I have with that "placeholder" wiki is the obviously erroneous description of the costume as gothic lolita when it's not. If a costume tag doesn't have a preexisting wiki I see no issue with someone writing "A costume for ___ from ___" or something succinct like that.