Pokemon Costume Implications

The bulk update request #43599 (forum #365949) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #43600 (forum #365951) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BUR #43743 is pending approval.

create implication clive_(pokemon) -> clavell_(pokemon)

This won't get caught by the bot. Also, it's immediately obvious if you've seen Clavell once.

There are other disguised identities that we don't currently do this with. Like Blaziken Mask -> Meyer or Masked Royal -> Professor Kukui.

Personally, I don't mind keeping them separate.

Obst said:

Personally, I don't mind keeping them separate.

Sure, but clive_(pokemon) -clavell_(pokemon) has zero results, and your first example has only one post.

The game essentially belts you over the head with the fact it's Clavell almost immediately when "Clive" appears for the first time. I have no issues with this implication.

BUR #44426 is pending approval.

create implication silver_(arc_suit)_(pokemon) -> silver_(pokemon)

beep boop

• Link to tags that couldn't be submitted

This is an automatic post. Use topic #31779 to report errors/false positives or general feedback.

BUR #44549 is pending approval.

create implication ethan_(arc_suit)_(pokemon) -> ethan_(pokemon)

beep boop

• Link to tags that couldn't be submitted

This is an automatic post. Use topic #31779 to report errors/false positives or general feedback.