Polka dot pantyhose implication

BUR #43968 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication polka_dot_pantyhose -> polka_dot
create implication polka_dot_pantyhose -> pantyhose

Self-explanatory.

I can get behind the first two lines, but is that last line for the alias necessary? Nothing else has that kind of alias.

forum #370716 and forum #370714 have the same problem. Splitting them up between topics like this was probably not the best move.

hasu_no_tokimeki said:

I can get behind the first two lines, but is that last line for the alias necessary? Nothing else has that kind of alias.

There is a forum about this: topic #7860
I've removed these lines, and I will make BUR there if these aliases are necessary.

Heh, seems autocomplete didn't properly show them to me. It's a small fraction out of a lot of tags that don't have them, and those aliases were made back then because autocomplete hadn't been changed to ignore certain characters, so it was necessary.

The bulk update request #43968 (forum #370715) has been approved by @evazion.