Correct.
On most sites, people just mean petite when they say loli. Here we specifically mean prepubescent body.
Posted under General
DivideByZero said:
Not loli.
post #9644721 looks not loli imo
asgembed said:
I lean towards yes.
Looks about 13 or so, shota seems pushing it.
post #9545183 and its child
Placeholder1996 said:
post #9545183 and its child
I think the pubic hair is just enough to not be tagged.
post #9658223 and its children.
check this: post #9672542
asgembed said:
post #9658223 and its children.
I'm not convinced. It looks borderline at worst, especially considering she has noticeable breast growth reasonable for her apparent age.
馮福水牛校軾昆 said:
check this: post #9672542
The breasts in these, on the other hand, are comically overdeveloped for the girls' apparent ages, so it should still apply for loli.