Possible art fight attack tag?

It's Art Fight season and I've noticed we have quite a few posts for it so I think it would be a good idea to have a new meta tag referencing it similar to our commission tags.
I'm undecided on if it should be called art fight attack or art fight gift. Attack is the term used by the site itself but gift is easier to understand for people unfamiliar to the site.
Also, should this tag be implied to gift art or art trade?
From what I understand of the site you don't seem to need to give art back so I think gift art is more accurate but both of them have been used for art fight attacks.
I'm actually remembering to ask before making a new tag. It's a miracle.

BUR #44606 has been approved by @evazion.

mass update favgroup:45499 -> art_fight_attack
create alias art_fight_gift -> art_fight_attack

The more accurate tag as the main one.

BUR #44607 has been rejected.

mass update favgroup:45499 -> art_fight_gift
create alias art_fight_attack -> art_fight_gift

Or the easier to understand one.

Make sure to categorize it as meta, whatever we go with (personally more in favor of art fight attack because it is much more accurate terminology).

It should probably imply gift art, regardless (not sure about art trade, as those have rules art fight attacks don't seem to follow, like in theory being able to track down an artwork for the inverse pair-up on a given post).

Knowledge_Seeker said:

Make sure to categorize it as meta, whatever we go with (personally more in favor of art fight attack because it is much more accurate terminology).

It should probably imply gift art, regardless (not sure about art trade, as those have rules art fight attacks don't seem to follow, like in theory being able to track down an artwork for the inverse pair-up on a given post).

once one of the burs goes thru (likely the first one), can someone make a bur for categorising it as meta and imply gift art? i wanna do it but i'll probably be late to the punch if i do

Knowledge_Seeker said:

Make sure to categorize it as meta, whatever we go with (personally more in favor of art fight attack because it is much more accurate terminology).

It should probably imply gift art, regardless (not sure about art trade, as those have rules art fight attacks don't seem to follow, like in theory being able to track down an artwork for the inverse pair-up on a given post).

speardovich said:

once one of the burs goes thru (likely the first one), can someone make a bur for categorising it as meta and imply gift art? i wanna do it but i'll probably be late to the punch if i do

I was going to switch the tag to meta manually afterwards if one of the burs go through, since it's only 81 posts, and then make the BURs on whether it should be implied to gift art or art trade. I didn't want to go too crazy on making BURs immediately when I didn't even know if this was a tag anyone else wanted.

The bulk update request #44606 (forum #372817) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #44607 (forum #372818) has been rejected by @evazion.

BUR #44711 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication art_fight_attack -> gift_art

bur went through, time to imply

BUR #44713 has been rejected.

create implication art_fight_attack -> art_trade

Also the alt BUR.

BUR #44714 has been approved by @evazion.

create alias artfight_attack -> art_fight_attack
create alias artfight_gift -> art_fight_attack

And some aliases just because a lot of people spell it without the space. (Arguably redundant with the autocomplete but should be helpful for tagging at least)

wispydreamer said:

BUR #44713 has been rejected.

create implication art_fight_attack -> art_trade

Also the alt BUR.

I'm voting against this because participants of Art Fight aren't required to do revenge attacks on people who attack them and it's actually extremely common to attack someone only for them to never gift art back EVER, therefore art trade would be a incorrect implication.

The bulk update request #44713 (forum #373376) has been rejected by @evazion.

The bulk update request #44711 (forum #373374) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #44714 (forum #373379) has been approved by @evazion.