Implication for onahole job

Posted under Tags

create implication onahole_handjob -> onahole_job

onahole_job is the parent tag for this tag as well

I keep getting the error message "Can't create implication onahole_handjob -> onahole_job (onahole_handjob can't make up more than 90% of onahole_job)" when requesting an alias/implication so I just made one for footjob first

I get the message "Can't create implication onahole_footjob -> onahole_job (onahole_footjob must have at least 10 posts)" when I tried to add the proper tag "onahole_footjob". Seems like I can't add implications for either of them through the BUR form

Kaleidoscoped said:

i'm not sure about the utility of onahole_footjob and onahole_handjob as opposed to searching artificial_vagina footjob and artificial_vagina handjob, respectively. i guess in some way the onahole job tag could function as an umbrella tag for all types of -jobs performed using an artificial vagina?

also, you misspelled "onahole" in your first bur.

this is to distinguish between performing the sexual act with the use of an onahole rather than the onahole just being present in the image and unused or has already been used, similar to the sockjob tag, if you search sock and handjob or sock and footjob you would not necessarily see them using the sock to give a handjob or footjob

FunkyJustin said:

I get the message "Can't create implication onahole_footjob -> onahole_job (onahole_footjob must have at least 10 posts)" when I tried to add the proper tag "onahole_footjob". Seems like I can't add implications for either of them through the BUR form

That means the onahole footjob tag isn't large enough to qualify for an implication yet. Tags need to be a certain minimum size before you can request an implication to ensure that it's a worthwhile tag.

1