asymmetrical_gloves implies gloves

Posted under Tags

zzzonk said:

BUR #42646 is pending approval.

create implication asymmetrical_gloves -> gloves

it's on other glove variants, but not this one.

Currently upvoted. Though an interesting thing is that mismatched gloves and uneven gloves imply both asymmetrical gloves and gloves.

If this goes through, wouldn’t the gloves implication by these two tags become redundant? Since mismatched gloves and uneven gloves imply asymmetrical gloves, which would then imply gloves. Or are redundant implications removed automatically?

BUR #42836 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

remove implication mismatched_gloves -> gloves
remove implication uneven_gloves -> gloves

aster1a said:

Currently upvoted. Though an interesting thing is that mismatched gloves and uneven gloves imply both asymmetrical gloves and gloves.

If this goes through, wouldn’t the gloves implication by these two tags become redundant? Since mismatched gloves and uneven gloves imply asymmetrical gloves, which would then imply gloves. Or are redundant implications removed automatically?

No, they need to be removed if the BUR goes through

This thread's lost its focus and just become a dumping ground for random BURs. Even worse is mixing and matching completely different topics into one BUR (e.g. 42839 containing implication requests for chairs and body parts). Each bur (and topic really) should focus on one main thing and you should probably be familiar with the use of some of the tags you're requesting changes for as some of these are either meh, don't make much sense or aren't particularly useful to have.

1