RFC: Grouping stealth actions to stealth_indecency

Posted under Tags

We have lots of tags starting with stealth_ . I purpose to make all of them implying stealth_indecency, on the contrast of public_indecency.

Compared to public_indecency, the chance of being seen should be notably smaller. e.g. sex behaviors happening in a separate room (post #9401050), or bondages with clothes covering the ropes (post #8033719).

This also completes the tag group:sex acts with a dintinct tag for stealthy behaviors.

Purposed BUR:

imply stealth_sex -> stealth_indecency 
imply stealth_masturbation -> stealth_indecency 
imply stealth_fellatio -> stealth_indecency 
imply stealth_handjob -> stealth_indecency 
imply stealth_bondage -> stealth_indecency 
imply stealth_footjob -> stealth_indecency 
imply stealth_fingering -> stealth_indecency 
imply stealth_cunnilingus -> stealth_indecency 
imply stealth_paizuri -> stealth_indecency 

This BUR can not be completed since stealth_sex makes more than 90% of stealth_indecency. They are not the same however.
I reviewed the error message and it says every tag listed here makes more than 90% of stealth_indecency. What's wrong?

I'd like to hear your suggestions on this problem: What should I do, or should I not touch anything?

Also a RFC: should stealth_indecency imply exhibitionism? tag group:sex acts lists stealth_* under exhibitionism currently.

Updated by ZeroAurora

Blank_User said:

You added stealth indecency to only two posts. All of the tags you're trying to implicate it to have more posts than that. The tag will need to be populated first, though it may be best to make sure others are on board with it.

Those two posts are not tagged to this by me (lol). Thanks for your fix!

I will continue waiting for other people's opinion.

1