Holding implications

BUR #44768 has been rejected.

create implication holding_candy_apple -> holding

I forgot to add this to the above.

@Placeholder1996 said:

BUR #44768 has been rejected.

create implication holding_candy_apple -> holding

No, the better implication should have been like this
imply holding_candy_apple -> holding_food
imply holding_candy_apple -> candy_apple

Black_Metal_ist_Krieg said:

No, the better implication should have been like this
imply holding_candy_apple -> holding_food
imply holding_candy_apple -> candy_apple

you're right, I missed that.

The bulk update request #44768 (forum #373568) has been rejected by @Placeholder1996.

I edited my first one (just discovered how to do that) and self-rejected my second to fit the better format.

BUR #44795 has been rejected.

create implication holding_candy_apple -> holding_food
create implication holding_candy_apple -> candy_apple

Accidental duplicate, see the previous forum #373565 instead.

The bulk update request #44795 (forum #373662) has been rejected by @Black_Metal_ist_Krieg.

BUR #44849 is pending approval.

create implication holding_crutch -> crutch

Holding a crutch implies the presence of a crutch.