Posted under Tags
BUR #44770 is pending approval.
create implication business_card -> card
A business card is a card, of which the wiki includes business cards as an example.
The wiki for card also says:
This tag is for cards physically present inside the image. For an entire image drawn to look like a card or an image of the card face itself, see card (medium).
Similarly, here’s card (medium):
For cards that are physical objects inside the image, see card.
However, (first tag that comes to mind) playing card implies card. Posts such as post #9481128, post #9456333 and post #9249492 (or just check playing_card card_(medium)) end up with both card (medium) and card, even when there is no card present within the image.
So how does it work? Does playing card apply there? If so, should it still imply card?
aster1a said:
However, (first tag that comes to mind) playing card implies card. Posts such as post #9481128, post #9456333 and post #9249492 (or just check playing_card card_(medium)) end up with both card (medium) and card, even when there is no card present within the image.
So how does it work? Does playing card apply there? If so, should it still imply card?
Here's another complication. What about when the image is entirely a business card? Here's one like that: post #4429388 (though, this is the only image like that I could find.)
I think playing_card and business_card should therefore not imply card, but instead have to be manually tagged as either card or card (medium).
floating card is fine though. It can't be both floating and be the entire image.
CrossbowArcanePlus said:
Here's another complication. What about when the image is entirely a business card? Here's one like that: post #4429388 (though, this is the only image like that I could find.)
That looks more like an id card to me. Funnily enough, we have id card (medium), but it has very few posts.
aster1a said:
That looks more like an id card to me. Funnily enough, we have id card (medium), but it has very few posts.
Oh yeah, my bad. Going a bit too fast I guess.
In that case, I agree that business_card should imply card.
Back on playing_card - and this logic extends to some future situation where a possible business_card_(medium) image is posted - I think playing_card should imply card, and there should be a playing_card_(medium) tag that implies card_(medium), and one should only cross tags over between those two camps if there is indeed a playing-card like image which contains a depiction of a playing card within that "whole image" playing card. The images you posted shouldn't be tagged playing_card card imo, because a playing_card is not depicted in the image. Just like how a card_(medium) image isn't (necessarily) tagged card.
