Nuke commentary_typo

BUR #58140 has been rejected.

nuke commentary_typo

Was being discussed with other users in the Discord server. It seems like a tag that doesn't serve any meaningful purpose. I don't see why anyone would specifically search for it either.

The bulk update request #58140 (forum #434659) has been rejected by @sakurada_ichigo.

Why was this rejected so early?

I do question why we have this, it's harmless, I would have meh-ed it. But this feels like something that is just being tagged for the sake of being tagged.

BUR #58162 is pending approval.

nuke commentary_typo

This was rejected too early so I'm resubmitting it; I think this is an unnecessary tag that isn't useful.

Looks like OP got cold feet to me. Probably didn't realize mehs weren't the flashing red "DO NOT GO THROUGH" sign I feel like a majority of downvotes tend to be lol.

As for this tag, I don't care. I don't entirely see why it should exist, but not enough to inherently reject the concept outright yet, so I need more persuasion. I do agree this was rejected way too early tho. Definitely discussion to be had.

The only real utility I could see for this would be as an indicator that a typo in the commentary comes from the source and isn't due to uploader error. Still doesn't seem all that useful though.

Is there any use for this tag in non-English commentaries with typos? I remember post #9679038:

ハサミは地面に倒れた。

This commentary arguably should be translated as "the scissors fell on the ground" since Hasumi was misspelled as hasami, which means scissors.

commentary_typo commentary_request is mostly unremarkable typos, but I found post #9624079, where Ines Fuujin is misspelled Ines Ujin - both in the commentary and the art. But there's enough results where it might be worth keeping, at least for now?

I feel like this was mostly made because we have typo, as most tags that related to in-image tags seem to have a commentary counterpart. Still doesn't seem super useful though, I think it's fine to nuke.

Knowledge_Seeker said in forum #434749:

Looks like OP got cold feet to me. Probably didn't realize mehs weren't the flashing red "DO NOT GO THROUGH" sign I feel like a majority of downvotes tend to be lol.

You nailed it LOL. I saw the "meh"s and thought "oh no, people don't like this". I'll know for next time to leave things as is

sakurada_ichigo said in forum #434822:

You nailed it LOL. I saw the "meh"s and thought "oh no, people don't like this". I'll know for next time to leave things as is

No worries! Happens to the best of us. Now you know for next time you create a BUR.

leave it be, give peace a chance, harmless like the flower by the roadside;
could be useful to find atrocious and fun spellings of char names like the famous Francdoll Scarret from post #10183

Iroshi2020qsound said in forum #435172:

leave it be, give peace a chance, harmless like the flower by the roadside;
could be useful to find atrocious and fun spellings of char names like the famous Francdoll Scarret from post #10183

Wouldn't the funny ones be under engrish commentary? or japanese ranguage commentary?

zetsubousensei said in forum #435181:

Wouldn't the funny ones be under engrish commentary? or japanese ranguage commentary?

that is a new invention, from DEC2025, whilst the older commentary typo is from APR2018
8 years = more people know it exists and can use it