Posted under General
BillyScranner said in forum #435920:
Submitting here because curious, been looking into more and more ways to attempt to identify AI art. is this AI?
I don't think so? But some people I know have said it might be
It was posted to twitter on September 2019, no generative image model back then was advanced enough to create all of the coherent detail in the drawing.
You're also going to have to explain how an established artist with 600+ posts here is using AI.
shemingwan_wen said in forum #436000:
It was posted to twitter on September 2019, no generative image model back then was advanced enough to create all of the coherent detail in the drawing.
You're also going to have to explain how an established artist with 600+ posts here is using AI.
Yea, I assumed not. But I was told to come here just to double check, one of the reasons I was so sure it wasn't AI was the fact the artist had so much on here. But thanks for the assurance!
This is more of a general report for this particular "artist", vlizz, as after some checking their account was made after AI became a big thing and they seem to be posting full, completed pictures within days; you'd expect them to be posting rough sketches at that pace, not entire colored "art".
hanwen1234 said in forum #436189:
This is more of a general report for this particular "artist", vlizz, as after some checking their account was made after AI became a big thing and they seem to be posting full, completed pictures within days; you'd expect them to be posting rough sketches at that pace, not entire colored "art".
asset #48046283(post #9608254): can't see layer and suspections
asset #48046285(post #10598732): size difference and blank
asset #48046288(post #9106623): weird background
I think 80% probability they are AI-assisted.
Updated by NO AI ON DANBOORU
post #11197196 and post #11204293
Flagged for "suspected AI-generated content". I can't find any artefacts. Is there any validity to this?
ion288 said in forum #436333:
post #11197196 and post #11204293
Flagged for "suspected AI-generated content". I can't find any artefacts. Is there any validity to this?
Yes, they are AI.
post #11204293, see red circles on asset #48049823.
Another pic, see red circles on asset #48049840.
eco_376124
Looks like ai-assisted
vivrose_a said in forum #436430:
eco_376124
Looks like ai-assisted
Obviously.
See asset #48054920, asset #48054923, asset #48054927, asset #48054932, asset #48054936, asset #48054943
I can find more...
I even can say they are ai-generated
I want to upload https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/112701824/artworks but I can't tell if it's ai. His artist profile was created some months ago, but has no pictures uploaded and no commentary.
och8 said in forum #436458:
I want to upload https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/112701824/artworks but I can't tell if it's ai. His artist profile was created some months ago, but has no pictures uploaded and no commentary.
I don't see anything suspicious; I think it would be fine to post these.
Someone mass-tagged their artwork as ai-assisted, however I don't think so, was there any proof or controversy surrounding this artist?
vivrose_a said in forum #436678:
Someone mass-tagged their artwork as ai-assisted, however I don't think so, was there any proof or controversy surrounding this artist?
I don’t know the artist, but a prior discussion can be found in forum #323156 and forum #323178. However, it’s from over a year ago.
Edit: Actually, most of the tags were added in that period of time, so the discussion is most likely linked to this.
Updated by aster1a
Uploads that are “drawn” from a known AI generator:
The last one’s horns aren’t even how the character Sunbringer’s horns normally look like. Neither in her old design or her current official redesign.
sinhaven69 said in forum #436729:
Uploads that are “drawn” from a known AI generator:
The last one’s horns aren’t even how the character Sunbringer’s horns normally look like. Neither in her old design or her current official redesign.
Last one is so blatantly AI. Other 2 probably are at least assisted on
B17Bomber said in forum #436799:
Last one is so blatantly AI. Other 2 probably are at least assisted on
I think they are all ai-gen, post #11280485's line arts are obviously ai-gen, and left of the post has a very bad edit.
Updated by NO AI ON DANBOORU
NO_AI_ON_DANBOORU said in forum #436887:
I think they are all ai-gen, post #1120485's line arts are obviously ai-gen, and left of the post has a very bad edit.
I believe that's a typo on the post there, as I don't believe a 14 year old Yukishiro Honoka cosplaying as Cure Black post can be AI.
Knowledge_Seeker said in forum #436891:
I believe that's a typo on the post there, as I don't believe a 14 year old Yukishiro Honoka cosplaying as Cure Black post can be AI.
Thanks for notice my mistake😅
Can someone check post #11285235?
I didn't think much before uploading it because the artist is old and looked credible, but now that I look at it again she looks different than how he usually draws her and also similar to some ai art I saw before.
kaii_modo said in forum #436893:
Can someone check post #11285235?
I didn't think much before uploading it because the artist is old and looked credible, but now that I look at it again she looks different than how he usually draws her and also similar to some ai art I saw before.
His some artworks you saw are posted a few years ago, don't worry.
Hello everyone.
I recently uploaded a few images by the artist viran-gt (all nsfw):
post #11288823
post #11288832
post #11289016
post #11289017
post #11289019
I have to admit, I was sceptical myself before uploading as there are plenty of visual AI symptoms.
Sure enough, as I kind of expected, I got a sceptical pm from an approver (@Veraducks) shortly after posting.
However, looking further at their Pixiv profile, they have some older works and sketches consistent with their evolution in artstyle, which were allegedly drawn in 2020:
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/132858935
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/132859413
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/132863877
None of their works are tagged as AI-generated on there either. Though that doesn't necessarily mean they aren't, I found no further signs of AI usage on their profile or Twitter, so I proceeded with the uploads.
I did run the posts through some page-one-on-Google AI checkers, but I also ran some other images through them which I know are not AI which gave false positives, so I am not sure if they are trustworthy.
As I like to go by 'innocent until proven guilty', does anyone care to assist in my investigation? Is this good faith and just unfortunately similar to the AI standard, or an elaborate hoax which I fell for?
Thanks.
Updated by fgbooru
