Posted under Tags
BUR #58264 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication virtuosa_(ambience_synesthesia_2026)_(arknights) -> virtuosa_(arknights)
beep boop
This is an automatic post. Use topic #31779 to report errors/false positives or general feedback.
BUR #58371 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication kal'tsit_esperanta_(arknights) -> kal'tsit_(arknights)
New alter.
BUR #58415 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication gracebearer_(purification_of_the_past)_(arknights) -> gracebearer_(arknights)
create implication mon3tr_(sharpened_claws)_(arknights) -> mon3tr_(arknights)
create implication savage_(yet_another_autumn)_(arknights) -> savage_(arknights)
New recent skins.
Updated by FratmCforo
The bulk update request #58264 (forum #435208) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #58371 (forum #435587) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #58415 (forum #435745) has been approved by @evazion.
BUR #58513 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication exusiai_the_new_covenant_(the_legend_seeker)_(arknights) -> exusiai_the_new_covenant_(arknights)
create implication haruka_(stranded_in_utopia)_(arknights) -> haruka_(arknights)
create implication aroma_(picnic_times)_(arknights) -> aroma_(arknights)
create implication nowell_(the_spirit_farer)_(arknights) -> nowell_(arknights)
New skins for Exusiai The New Covenant, Haruka, Aroma and Nowell.
Updated by FratmCforo
The bulk update request #58513 (forum #436143) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
BUR #58856 has been approved by @evazion.
create alias yeti_caster_leader_(arknights) -> yeti_squadron_(arknights)
All Yeti squadron enemies more or less wear the same thing. (Refer to the Yeti Squadron paragraph here)
BUR #59032 has been approved by @evazion.
rename talulah_(act_iii)_(arknights) -> talulah_(chapter_16)_(arknights)
create implication talulah_(chapter_17)_(arknights) -> talulah_(arknights)
create implication kal'tsit_(puppet)_(arknights) -> kal'tsit_(arknights)
create implication kal'tsit_esperanta_(the_unbounded_folio)_(arknights) -> kal'tsit_esperanta_(arknights)
The design in chapter 16 was named act_iii since we have others like that (Closure (Act ii) (Arknights), Closure (Act iii) (Arknights), Amiya (Act ii) (Arknights)), but she got a different design during chapter 17 (post #11324775), which is also in act 3, so I guess it needs to be renamed.
Also made a tag for the Kal'tsit puppet since we got some fanart of that.
edit: Added Kal'tsit alter skin.
Updated by Talulah
I'm not a fan of the puppet being a character tag...
Also, where is that skin coming from? I only found this from the anniversary stream. It's not an in-game skin, at least not yet I believe.
(Side note: Should we have a tag for some other collaboration outfits, like post #8585409 coming from the Keep Fitness collab?)
Login_to_view said in forum #438111:
I'm not a fan of the puppet being a character tag...
I haven't seen others to lead to it being a tag like dragon bean (arknights). We also have Exusiai (Apple) (Arknights). (Also some other properties have character tags for things like dragon beans, like the cake cats from HSR I believe.)
Also, where is that skin coming from? I only found this from the anniversary stream. It's not an in-game skin, at least not yet I believe.
(Side note: Should we have a tag for some other collaboration outfits, like post #8585409 coming from the Keep Fitness collab?)
Collab, yeah. If multiple artists are drawing it, it should be fine, even if it isn't a playable skin. We got Mostima (Sports) (Arknights) and Angelina (Sports) (Arknights) for example.
The bulk update request #59032 (forum #438020) has been approved by @evazion.
BUR #59077 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication amiya_(medic)_(the_unbounded_folio)_(arknights) -> amiya_(medic)_(arknights)
beep boop
This is an automatic post. Use topic #31779 to report errors/false positives or general feedback.
The bulk update request #59077 (forum #438279) has been approved by @evazion.
BUR #59090 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication elysium_(elite_ii)_(arknights) -> elysium_(arknights)
Elite II outfit
BUR #59272 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication w_(summer)_(arknights) -> w_(arknights)
create implication w_(ballerina)_(arknights) -> w_(arknights)
create implication lappland_(teenage)_(arknights) -> lappland_(arknights)
create implication lappland_(young)_(arknights) -> lappland_(arknights)
The official status of W's swimsuit design remains ambiguous, as this design was adopted as a special bonus in the physical edition of the official four-panel comic "123 Rhodes Island."
The differences between Lappland's young and teenage outfit designs and the Refined Horrormare be found in post #10891992.
feng8488 said in forum #438792:
BUR #59272 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication w_(summer)_(arknights) -> w_(arknights)
create implication w_(ballerina)_(arknights) -> w_(arknights)
create implication lappland_(teenage)_(arknights) -> lappland_(arknights)
create implication lappland_(young)_(arknights) -> lappland_(arknights)The official status of W's swimsuit design remains ambiguous, as this design was adopted as a special bonus in the physical edition of the official four-panel comic "123 Rhodes Island."
The differences between Lappland's young and teenage outfit designs and the Refined Horrormare be found in post #10891992.
I know W's swimsuit has more untagged fan art images, but do the other three have posts other than the only tagged at the moment references to warrant a tag for each?
hdk5 said in forum #438794:
I know W's swimsuit has more untagged fan art images, but do the other three have posts other than the only tagged at the moment references to warrant a tag for each?
The ballerina one should have enough to justify a tag but I question whether it makes sense to have a tag for the last two currently.
Edit: Switched to upvoting following the population of the tags.
Updated by Kawakijin
hdk5 said in forum #438794:
I know W's swimsuit has more untagged fan art images, but do the other three have posts other than the only tagged at the moment references to warrant a tag for each?
Kawakijin said in forum #438797:
The ballerina one should have enough to justify a tag but I question whether it makes sense to have a tag for the last two currently.
Regarding the Lappland-related content, I’ve currently found about 20 posts for each category. I’d like to ask if this is enough to warrant creating separate tags for them…
Updated by feng8488
