The Vtuber Alternate Costume Tagging Proposal

BUR #58620 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication marimari_(summer)_(vtuber) -> marimari_(vtuber)
create implication marimari_(2nd_costume)_(vtuber) -> marimari_(vtuber)

Adding implications for Marimari's 2nd and summer outfit

BUR #58639 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication tentei_forte_(1st_costume) -> tentei_forte
create implication tentei_forte_(2nd_costume) -> tentei_forte

Costume implications for Neo-Porte's Tentei Forte.

The bulk update request #58639 (forum #436573) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #58620 (forum #436528) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BUR #58718 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication kanna_yanagi_(1st_costume) -> kanna_yanagi
create implication kanna_yanagi_(harpy) -> kanna_yanagi
create implication kanna_yanagi_(victorian) -> kanna_yanagi

Costume implications for Glitch Stars' Kanna Yanagi.

BUR #58719 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

mass update favgroup:54932 -> -ichinose_uruha_(1st_costume) char:ichinose_uruha_(8th_costume)
create implication ichinose_uruha_(8th_costume) -> ichinose_uruha

This is supposed to be a remake of Ichinose Uruha's original costume, and it's currently tagged as such, but it's almost completely different.
Compare: asset #47263433 (old) vs. asset #48084085 (new)

BUR #58728 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication tachibana_hinano_(school_uniform) -> tachibana_hinano

Adding implication for Hinano's newest outfit

The bulk update request #58465 (forum #435995) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #58718 (forum #436933) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #58719 (forum #436940) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #58728 (forum #436982) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BUR #58888 has been rejected.

create implication rin_penrose_(old_design) -> rin_penrose
create implication rin_penrose_(rin_2.0) -> rin_penrose

Adding implications for Rin Penrose's outfits

BUR #58892 has been rejected.

create alias rin_penrose_(old_design) -> rin_penrose_1
create alias rin_penrose_(rin_2.0) -> rin_penrose_2

I'm pretty damn sure she refers to these designs this way. There's no need to retrofit them to fit Rodent's format.

hasu_no_hassennen said in forum #437565:

BUR #58892 has been rejected.

create alias rin_penrose_(old_design) -> rin_penrose_1
create alias rin_penrose_(rin_2.0) -> rin_penrose_2

I'm pretty damn sure she refers to these designs this way. There's no need to retrofit them to fit Rodent's format.

Those names don't really work unlike the point system which we currently got

BUR #58982 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication tomoe_umari_(sundress) -> tomoe_umari

Adding implications for Tomoe's newest outfit

BUR #58987 has been approved by @evazion.

create alias rin_penrose_(old_design) -> rin_penrose_(rin_1.0)

TheGamingRodent said in forum #437569:

Those names don't really work unlike the point system which we currently got

OK, then why isn't Rin Penrose (Old Design) Rin Penrose (Rin 1.0), like how Irys (Irys 1.0) (hololive) isn't Irys (old design) (hololive)?

Here, an alternate BUR, to actually fit the "point system". I don't prefer this, but I might as well. IMO, this just makes the tags needlessly long, especially since we got gems like Rin Penrose 2 Direct Analysis and Rin Penrose 1 gets thrown down a well.

hasu_no_hassennen said in forum #437885:

BUR #58987 has been approved by @evazion.

create alias rin_penrose_(old_design) -> rin_penrose_(rin_1.0)

OK, then why isn't Rin Penrose (Old Design) Rin Penrose (Rin 1.0), like how Irys (Irys 1.0) (hololive) isn't Irys (old design) (hololive)?

Here, an alternate BUR, to actually fit the "point system". I don't prefer this, but I might as well. IMO, this just makes the tags needlessly long, especially since we got gems like Rin Penrose 2 Direct Analysis and Rin Penrose 1 gets thrown down a well.

I didn't make the tags, I was just posting the bur, also again the way Rin uses the terms won't work with how we do costume tags to my knowledge, and I know Rin called them "Rin Penrose 1/2", but in my honest opinion, I think she was being cheeky about it

The main issue with Rin Penrose 1 and Rin Penrose 2 isn't the fact that Rin's just using them jokingly, it's the fact that, in a tagging context, it makes me think of Thing 1 and Thing 2 from the Cat in the Hat - two seperate characters like Tohno Shiki and Tohno Shiki (Original). Having qualifiers makes it more obvious it's just two different designs for the same person.

The bulk update request #58892 (forum #437565) has been rejected by @hasu_no_hassennen.

The bulk update request #58982 (forum #437870) has been approved by @evazion.