alias clitoris_piercing -> clitoral_piercing

BUR #58825 has been rejected.

create alias clitoris_piercing -> clitoral_piercing
create implication clitoral_piercing -> piercing
create implication clitoral_piercing -> pussy_piercing
create implication clitoris_ring -> clitoral_piercing

The clitoris piercing wiki defines itself as "A female genital piercing through the glans clitoris or surrounding tissues (including clitoral hood piercings and triangle piercings)." At the same time, 1625/2144 clitoris piercing images are not tagged with clitoris, and it is often ambiguous whether the piercing(s) go through the clitoris or clitoral hood. Most images depict piercings in the clitoral region broadly, not necessarily through the glans clitoris, and in many cases the exact anatomy is unclear (censoring, perspective, etc). Aliasing to clitoral piercing aligns the name with current usage without requiring gardening or introducing a separate clitoral hood piercing tag.

EDIT:
BUR #58831 below does the same, but removes redundant implications, adds a pussy piercing -> piercing implication, and cleans up the now unnecessary implications
(thanks goes to @Ylimegirl for the insights)

Clitoris piercing already implies piercing and pussy piercing and is already implied by clitoral piercing, so those implications would remain with the alias. I think it makes more sense to imply pussy piercing to piercing and then remove the redundant implication.

Ylimegirl said in forum #437356:

Clitoris piercing already implies piercing and pussy piercing and is already implied by clitoral piercing, so those implications would remain with the alias. I think it makes more sense to imply pussy piercing to piercing and then remove the redundant implication.

Ah, thank you. I was wondering how aliasing a tag would affect the other related tags. And good catch on pussy piercing/piercing.

BUR #58831 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create alias clitoris_piercing -> clitoral_piercing
remove implication clitoris_piercing -> piercing
remove implication labia_piercing -> piercing
create implication pussy_piercing -> piercing

- 1st line: same as before
- 2nd/3rd/4th lines: clitoris piercing and labia_piercing already imply pussy piercing, so these implications wouldn't be necessary once pussy_piercing implies piercing
(full credit for this BUR goes to @Ylimegirl)

The bulk update request #58825 (forum #437351) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #58831 (forum #437361) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BUR #58866 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

remove implication clitoral_piercing -> piercing

order of operations meant this implication wasn't actually removed

The bulk update request #58866 (forum #437472) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

@Ylimegirl for President?