post #11291089
post #11247892
post #11243555post #11246896
Would like to know why the first post didn't go through, and why the other 4 didn't go through the appeal check, don't see anything wrong in either
Updated by TheGamingRodent
Posted under General
post #11291089
post #11247892
post #11243555post #11246896
Would like to know why the first post didn't go through, and why the other 4 didn't go through the appeal check, don't see anything wrong in either
Updated by TheGamingRodent
Why was this one excluded?
post #11274137
can I know why these didn't get approved as there's no reason provided?
post #11247011(parent approved)
post #11246788(didn't see any difference with other works from the same artist)
post #11291599 (Thanks!)
This one's alright, I believe.
Updated by StarfishAtLarge
I have appealed post #11291735.
Personally speaking,I do not see too many serious anatomical errors and believe it should get a stay.
Mr.Ritsuka said in forum #437788:
I have appealed post #11291735.
Personally speaking,I do not see too many serious anatomical errors and believe it should get a stay.
Watch an approver give exactly that reason and contrive some excuse for it to not be uploaded.
RainbowLightZone said in forum #437793:
Watch an approver give exactly that reason and contrive some excuse for it to not be uploaded.
Should I change the reason?
ANON_TOKYO said in forum #437796:
That leg looks horrible, it's messed up and very central in the picture.
I see. When I uploaded the art in the first place,I thought the arms and legs were because of posing and “different distance from the viewer’s perspective.”
Updated by Mr.Ritsuka
Can someone explain why post #11252643 and the other four all got rejected twice? I don't know if it's just me but i feel like its quality is the same as the other posts from this artist.
Need to know why this post from an artist who's works have not been posted here before gets a deletion post #11224787
Inghwatc said in forum #437879:
Need to know why this post from an artist who's works have not been posted here before gets a deletion post #11224787
idk maybe because of the incredibly large breasts, penis, and testicles. Extreme posts like that are unlikely to be approved.
post #11318702
Not approved (or deleted) for no reason, I already added the tags.
JohnVeo said in forum #437902:
post #11318702
Not approved (or deleted) for no reason, I already added the tags.
The reason is there in the deletion banner. As I said in forum #437903, AI-generated images are against the upload rules.
HyphenSam said in forum #437881:
idk maybe because of the incredibly large breasts, penis, and testicles. Extreme posts like that are unlikely to be approved.
Is that why? This doesn't look that extreme for what's been approved here. Besides, what would be the use of huge_breasts and huge_penis if you can't have it be applied in an image post?
Inghwatc said in forum #437934:
Besides, what would be the use of huge_breasts and huge_penis if you can't have it be applied in an image post?
What do you mean by this? if huge_penis and huge_breasts is on the image, then apply the tags.
Updated by Massonia
Massonia said in forum #437938:
What do you mean by this? if huge_penis and huge_breasts is on the image, then apply the tags.
You know how some new users don't understand why we have an AI-generated tag if AI is not allowed? I think this user is following the same logic for huge breasts and huge penis. Of course, the difference is neither of the latter two are against the rules, nor are the gigantic variants, which are the tags that would actually apply to that post.
post #10851405
post #10846508
post #10846351
I would like to appeal the rejection of my upload. Could someone please give it a second look? Thank you.
This topic is to ask for feedback if your uploads are having trouble going through the queue so you can better understand what to look out for in a post and what might be leading to posts not getting approved. If a post is deleted and you think it deserves another look, you can appeal it yourself on the post's page. See howto:appeal.
post #11283770post #11281892 (where's the 'poor quality'?)
Hello, I would like some feedback as to why these didn't go through? Especially the 2nd post containing Gura, looks pretty okay in my eyes, the poor quality feedback on it is baffling to me
Updated by TheGamingRodent
