Could someone take a look at arcedo? post #11330885 got flagged as ai-generated, but I think this is incorrect (it might be ai-assisted though). If it is ai-generated however, then most of their recent artwork probably is as well.
Posted under General
Could someone take a look at arcedo? post #11330885 got flagged as ai-generated, but I think this is incorrect (it might be ai-assisted though). If it is ai-generated however, then most of their recent artwork probably is as well.
ion288 said in forum #438351:
post #9987418
Drawing incorrect hairpins seems like a human mistake. II don't see the hair claims.
AI and bad edit.
See asset #48194234 asset #48194239 asset #48194241 asset #48194246.
You can either tag them AI-generated or AI-assisted. I advise tag them AI-generated.
EdKroket said in forum #438356:
Could someone take a look at arcedo? post #11330885 got flagged as ai-generated, but I think this is incorrect (it might be ai-assisted though). If it is ai-generated however, then most of their recent artwork probably is as well.
arcedo is drawing since 2017, and the picture and another was marked as AI maybe AI-assisted.
Updated by NO AI ON DANBOORU
Saw this one posted on Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxcVAEpVEqqoMqrCjvVxpiwZl3QB3UeyKX
Poster didn't source it, so I can't tell if it's an AI self-upload or not.
Runty said in forum #438475:
Saw this one posted on Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/post/UgkxcVAEpVEqqoMqrCjvVxpiwZl3QB3UeyKX
Poster didn't source it, so I can't tell if it's an AI self-upload or not.
post #11329458 and post #11276831 both flagged without a tag.
The first one looks like its been format converted but I see no AI artifacts.
The second one probably wouldn't survive a proportions check but artist has no history of AI use. Though if the answer is "likely no AI" please check post #11330885, it has sus hair.
ion288 said in forum #438490:
post #11329458 and post #11276831 both flagged without a tag.
The first one looks like its been format converted but I see no AI artifacts.
The second one probably wouldn't survive a proportions check but artist has no history of AI use. Though if the answer is "likely no AI" please check post #11330885, it has sus hair.
post #11329458: poster admitted, see https://x.com/Mauesmel11/status/2053082106087997617.
post #11276831: I checked again and found some ai signs on Arcedo: post #7958767, see levin's sleevess; post #10053616, see hair ornament.
This artist's works seem to be ai-assisted at best, none of their posts are tagged as such currently, someone please confirm.
twitter #2031869772921782495
twitter #2033058628689863113
twitter #2028035636167618992
Fhtagn said in forum #438592:
This artist's works seem to be ai-assisted at best, none of their posts are tagged as such currently, someone please confirm.
twitter #2031869772921782495
twitter #2033058628689863113
twitter #2028035636167618992
Links all are ai gen.
The start of using AI: https://x.com/i/web/status/2028035636167618992
Little help here?
Account existed since 2022 but only started posting recently, doesn't look like AI to me but he's chinese and I don't know much about the models in there
post #11347011
Maybe one of those "delete every artkwork and start reuploading" artists
No artist tag on danbooru