Posted under General
The second tweet was based on the first. I'm not sure I really want to post the first one, but if I do, how should I parent the posts? Both are four-page comics.
twitter #2056162063240835233
twitter #2056436364212855135
For the single post below I simply set the base as the parent, but that won't work here
post #10815623
If the two links you shared were uploaded by the same artist, I would add unfinished to the simpler version and set the completed version(~55135) as the parent. However, if they are works by different artists, since the simpler version served as a motif for the other artist's work, I would add derivative work to the completed version and set the simpler version(~35233) as the parent.
This case appears to be the latter.
The base is by another artist.
Is this the parenting setup you're suggesting? It would be impossible to navigate through a comic that's a derivative work.
These templates are made to be re-used by many artists, they should get a tag instead of being parented.
gochujang i love you template? This way the tag name would match gochujang video call template
This artist generally does a lot of bases. While browsing his Twitter, I accidentally discovered that I'd previously posted something based on their bases.
post #11409604
post #10930850
Updated by てはいさ
てはいさ said in forum #440807:
The base is by another artist.
Is this the parenting setup you're suggesting? It would be impossible to navigate through a comic that's a derivative work.
That's a case like post #7780503 where each derivative work post is linked to one another. In these cases, I prioritize the parenting between the derivative work posts themselves.
In this example, the original scene is noted in the comments for each post, but honestly I think it's sufficient to just leave a note on the parent post indicating which work (or scene) it was derived from.
On a different note, how should "bare" bases be tagged? I personally used the "base_(art)" tag, but the original post with that tag was more of a reference to the DeviantArt base concept than a base itself. There's a "template" tag, but it's mainly for images, where the user is expected to paste in a background or enter text rather than draw anything themselves.
てはいさ said in forum #440810:
gochujang i love you template? This way the tag name would match gochujang video call template
This artist generally does a lot of bases. While browsing his Twitter, I accidentally discovered that I'd previously posted something based on their bases.
post #11409604
post #10930850
Yeah it's a bit of a pain, but that works I think.
てはいさ said in forum #440815:
On a different note, how should "bare" bases be tagged? I personally used the "base_(art)" tag, but the original post with that tag was more of a reference to the DeviantArt base concept than a base itself. There's a "template" tag, but it's mainly for images, where the user is expected to paste in a background or enter text rather than draw anything themselves.
The post you uploaded has hashtags #트레틀 and #이메레스 in commentary. #이메레스(Image Response) is where you draw something based on a given word or phrase, and #트레틀 seems to be what we're looking for. It's short for 트레이싱 틀 (tracing frame), and apparently pose base is the correct term in English.
BUR #59827 is pending approval.
mass update favgroup:55726 -> pose_base -base_(art) -template
And then the "base_(art)" tag would remain for references to bases like from DeviantArt?
What about this post? It uses dialogue created by someone else. What tag should I use to describe it?
post #11418576
https://x.com/NitoItiya/status/2037836102904803469/photo/1
The problem I'm seeing here is that YCHs are included in the favgroup, which both template and final version are supposed to fall under, as well as are a type of commission (which would not be something I want to see in a pose base tag).
I suppose if we don't care about that technicality, it's not going to be too annoying to exclude (as it is a correct in a technical sense). But do note that the overlap between pose base and YCH commission may pose a problem, as I search for pose bases to try drawing myself, and YCHs are something one commissions an artist to draw for you. Does that make sense at all? Or am I overthinking things as I tend to.
