mass edit request: hair over breasts => censor hair

Posted under General

Yavie said:
Actually, I'd say it would be better to remove the "censor_hair" tag instead.

The images where hair is censoring the nipples the "convenient_censor" tag can be applied. Not all the images with hair over breasts are censoring the nipples.

I like this solution. +1.

censor_hair says in the wiki that it's also for hair over the crotch, though I'm not sure how common that actually is. I suppose it technically cold be used for a guy as well, but exponentially more rarely. I'm not opposed the nuking it though, it is largely redundant.

ion288 said: Could some one make the mass edit for hair_over_breasts to convenient_censor and I will remove it from those that it does not apply to.

It seems like it'd be easier to just add convenient_censor where appropriate than to do a mass edit that could result in a large number of incorrect changes.

Also: removed censor_hair and applied hair_over_breasts for all censor_hair images where the hair was only covering the breasts.

That does however leave 4 pages of images where hair is covering the lower privates.

So what do we do? Leave censor_hair and define it as covering the ass/crotch? Or call it something new, and more specific to that?

If you leave it, then what tag will you use to search for hair censoring both the nipples and the ass/crotch? I'll agree with any option that doesn't require more than 1 tag to search for this type of censoring.

anon153 said:
If you leave it, then what tag will you use to search for hair censoring both the nipples and the ass/crotch?

censor_hair hair_over_breasts

I'll agree with any option that doesn't require more than 1 tag to search for this type of censoring.

A multi-tag search is a perfectly valid way of addressing the issue, so your objection is rather pointless.

1