nonamethanks said in forum #440485:
We are an anime site, not a court. Stop posting doxxing information or you will be banned.
ok.
Posted under General
nonamethanks said in forum #440485:
We are an anime site, not a court. Stop posting doxxing information or you will be banned.
ok.
ion288 said in forum #440443:
Flag without a tag. Very established artist. Is the skirt pattern supposed to match?
I think this is upscaled, AI de-watermarked, human edited, and/or a (filtered) scan. Compared to the Skeb version, post #11389816 is stretched horizontally slightly - overlaying them in Photoshop, I have to scale it to 73.78% x 73.26%.
There's some pretty significant differences in the coloring and small details. See the color and amount of particles in the top, shape of the eyebrow in the middle, and details in the flower stamens in the bottom:
That said, I think the skirt looks fine in both.
EDIT: And here's a comparison of the belts: https://files.catbox.moe/l6n4mb.png
propheticseia insane speed/quality, no record before april 2026 (not my flags)
Updated by Marlor
People are having an argument in the comments of post #11392808 over whether or not klopsiak is AI. Could use some more eyes on it.
Talulah said in forum #440714:
People are having an argument in the comments of post #11392808 over whether or not klopsiak is AI. Could use some more eyes on it.
I don't see any evidence of AI-generation; certainly nothing that I'd feel comfortable flagging. The artist doesn't post art that often either, just 4 images over the last half-year or so on Twitter. never mind on the stuck through part; I didn't see their NSFW twitter. I still don't see anything obvious though. The original commenter (and presumably, flagger) doesn't have any proof beyond "this artist is obviously using AI, I hate AI, they should be banned."
Edit, I looked at post #11392808 again and there are two places that could be artifacts; the eyes and where the hair drapes over her left arm, but it's hard to be certain.
Updated by Placeholder1996
Talulah said in forum #440714:
People are having an argument in the comments of post #11392808 over whether or not klopsiak is AI. Could use some more eyes on it.
The white stripes on the inside of her jacket look suspicious to me. They blend together on the right, and overall just look kind of blurry, for lack of a better word. The Pokeball on her hat doesn't look good.
post #11361778 Speech balloon is really blurry
post #11241196 Speech balloon looks bad, motion lines look bad
post #11077827 Trembling motion lines look bad, but also don't look like AI to me. Pattern on her clothing looks really messy, but that could be intentional to match her official outfit
post #11212577 Bikini frills look bad
post #10976058 Trembling lines look bad, speedlines look bad (aside from the thin white ones, which look out of place)
post #11340772 One eyebrow below hair, one above. I feel like the ties on her dolphin shorts should be mostly or entirely hidden from view
There's definitely some hand-drawn parts though. The artist likes to use a circle grid stamp in hair, I think they use a multi-line brush to draw additional parallel hair strands, and it looks like they use a variety of stamps/brushes to add texture to skin.
They also have an inconsistent art style. Compare post #11340772, where the lines have a consistent pencil-y texture, and post #11377560, where the lines look... extremely shitty. I'd say the former is at most traced, and the latter might be AI-generated and then passed through some kind of horrible filtering to give it a unique style. It's hard to say if the hair there is bad because it's AI-generated or because it went through some weird filter.
Is artist longfatbird using some AI-generation or some kind?
ojandora said in forum #440833:
Is artist longfatbird using some AI-generation or some kind?
No
Talulah said in forum #440714:
People are having an argument in the comments of post #11392808 over whether or not klopsiak is AI. Could use some more eyes on it.
I think they've switched to relying on AI entirely. Even if we assume the melty filter to be a benign stylistic choice (which I don't think it is, considering):
post #10072737 - hair strand morphs into left bra strap, door threshold splits under her feet for some reason, the lines in this and others in this style really just look like a "sketch" tag prompt with no human input
post #11340772 - where's the ribbon tie dangling from her stomach coming from
post #10215702 - bra straps do not line up behind arm
post #11113136 - window frame stops existing behind her crown
post #11340117 - window frame does not line up
post #9804727 - AI-generated BG, ceiling lines do not line up behind her head
And so on. The halftone textures and some individual hair strands look manually added but I'm not sure there's much else. Obviously their "pre-AI" art style doesn't have these issues, though it looks like they might've used AI-genned BGs before they started using it to render characters too.
Right hand and feet seem off. https://x.com/JackRo_423/status/2056015989066670216
Also seems a bit off from their other works.
The artist jxdz9 seems to be all AI art? The first upload (post #11327163) was deleted due to AI suspicion, but now there's 3 other uploads that were uploaded/approved:
post #11333389
post #11339537
post #11350790
They all use SDXL resolution as well.
Updated by sakurada ichigo
post #11404168 [NSFW]
This looks slightly suspicious to me, curious of other's opinions
sakurada_ichigo said in forum #440999:
The artist jxdz9 seems to be all AI art? The first upload (post #11327163) was deleted due to AI suspicion, but now there's 3 other uploads that were uploaded/approved:
post #11333389
post #11339537
post #11350790They all use SDXL resolution as well.
Found some suspections:
asset #48383674, asset #48383677
pc88 said in forum #441002:
post #11404168 [NSFW]
This looks slightly suspicious to me, curious of other's opinions
1000 resolutions, asset #48383787, asset #48383781, and tagged as AI on pixiv(by watcher).
pc88 said in forum #441002:
post #11404168 [NSFW]
This looks slightly suspicious to me, curious of other's opinions
The posts on pixiv have the AI-generated tag, so yes.
Updated by pegg
pegg said in forum #441015:
The posts on pixiv have the AI-generated tag, so yes.
It looks like those tags weren't added by the artist, so anyone could have added them and therefore not proof on their own. While I agree that it might be AI, I can't find anything definitive; the low resolution isn't helping. Edit, just looked at asset #48383781 posted above, and I think those are AI artifacts to the side of her right ear.
Updated by Placeholder1996
Placeholder1996 said in forum #441018:
It looks like those tags weren't added by the artist, so anyone could have added them and therefore not proof on their own. While I agree that it might be AI, I can't find anything definitive; the low resolution isn't helping. Edit, just looked at asset #48383781 posted above, and I think those are AI artifacts to the side of her right ear.
Oh you're right, I didn't check if it was a user tag. Either way, agree with you and the above that it's SDXL resolutions.
pc88 said in forum #441002:
post #11404168 [NSFW]
This looks slightly suspicious to me, curious of other's opinions
I think this could be AI generated. The ears are very asymmetrical, one directly connect to her face and one separated by sidelocks. The tips of hair strands at the bottom don't look great, on the left they kind of bleed into the line of the guy's thigh. A lot of the trembling lines look blurry.
First post was tagged AI-generated and two days later the "artist" was written as an AI artist. I tried to look up for the name on forums and couldn't find any posts related to it, so I created one instead. I do believe they are an AI prompter, a quick look on their social media and they are pumping quite a high amount of "high quality" art in a short time. The art style is similar to many AI art and there are certain parts of the first post that are suspicious.
post #11391931 looks a bit suspicious to me. I'm not 100% sure and the tags on Pixiv don't say it's AI-gen either but at the same time i got fooled by that twice and accidentally uploaded AI-gen content.
Inconsistent artstyle is what makes me suspicious of this post.
Oh, I also noticed a few artifacts here and there like her belt for example.
