post #4096441
All girls except the left one seem to be borderline in terms of apparent age.
Posted under General
post #4096441
All girls except the left one seem to be borderline in terms of apparent age.
post #11408323
post #11408325
I don't think it is, but I added it to be safe.
what makes post #8198592 not loli, considering its other variants are?
post #11315771 - toddlercon or just loli ?
post #11432704 She seems a little too old to me tag removed by another user
Updated by Placeholder1996
NerveControl said in forum #441263:
post #11315771 - toddlercon or just loli ?
Definitely not toddlercon, I removed it
@Placeholder1996 I think a lot of the posts you added to toddlercon a week ago don't quite fit. Characters like in post #11320007, post #11319604, post #11319127 or post #11318969 look too old even if some of them didn't literally have a randoseru with them. Toddlercon needs to be unambiguously below school age at the very least.
LightSolas said in forum #441380:
@Placeholder1996 I think a lot of the posts you added to toddlercon a week ago don't quite fit. Characters like in post #11320007, post #11319604, post #11319127 or post #11318969 look too old even if some of them didn't literally have a randoseru with them. Toddlercon needs to be unambiguously below school age at the very least.
Noted, sorry about that.
post #11137891
loli was added because of see-through_clothes, but it was later changed to tight_clothes (it's a navel outline, nothing appears beneath the shirt)
not sure if loli still applies in that context
jlyker89 said in forum #441509:
post #11137891
loli was added because of see-through_clothes, but it was later changed to tight_clothes (it's a navel outline, nothing appears beneath the shirt)
not sure if loli still applies in that context
It does, it's still definitely sexualized.
viliml said in forum #439432:
post #11353142
post #11217465
post #10905346
post #10905220
post #10857965
post #10711081
post #10272014
post #10226178
post #8222661
post #6638879
post #6128191
I don't think all of these are sexual enough to warrant the tag, but I don't know where to draw the line.
Bump.
viliml said in forum #441609:
Bump.
Most if not all of them are sexual enough to apply. The only one that's not as blatant is post #11353142, and even then, the way she's putting her hands on her own chest is still pretty suggestive.
I don't think loli applies to post #6638879, but only because she looks a bit older than the others.
post #7363283 Is this loli?
post #10816171 Waist seems curvy enough to not be a loli
Also, the seven posts in tag argonchann sameko_saba. -- The artist usually draw everyone with pretty big hips even when they have flat chest, unlike Danbooru's loli
post #11428428 Hip seems big enough
post #11440109 is this Saba a loli? At the very least, the rating is just sensitive at worst
post #7999487 Is this loli?
Updated by ziin1234
Does loli apply to post #4098022 and its variants?
post #11483736
Not G-worthy for sure, but I think shota might be a little extreme for this one.
Blank_User said in forum #443094:
post #11483736
Not G-worthy for sure, but I think shota might be a little extreme for this one.
Yeah, definitely not shota
does post #11490918 need the shota tag? there's a nude character with visible genitalia who looks young in the background, but he's presented mostly nonsexually.
OliveOil said in forum #443402:
does post #11490918 need the shota tag? there's a nude character with visible genitalia who looks young in the background, but he's presented mostly nonsexually.
Yes.