Posted under Tags
Is there a reason why some animal breeds and species imply their general tags, while most others do not?
For example:
siamese cat -> cat
japanese macaque -> monkey
angora rabbit -> rabbit
I initially thought these were isolated cases left over from the Oldbooru era and wanted to create a BUR proposing the removal of those implications.
But then I noticed that the bird tag also implies a many bird species, and now I'm completely confused.
What's the difference?
Prior discussion forum #356155
They are oldbooru things. All of these implications were done over a decade ago. The angora one is actually the most recent from topic #12202, which was still ten years ago.
BUR #60191 is pending approval.
remove implication siamese_cat -> cat
remove implication japanese_macaque -> monkey
remove implication angora_rabbit -> rabbit
Okay, setting aside the bird tag, I still think we should try removing the implications, since it looks pretty strange that, among all the species of these animals, only these three imply the general tag.
