Loli/shota check thread.

Posted under General

viliml said in forum #444598:

Makes me wonder, is there any point at which text-only references could qualify a post for the loli tag?

The wiki page clearly states "Sexually explicit or sexually suggestive artwork" and "Loli is applicable to ratings Explicit, Questionable, and Sensitive. Completely work-safe or non-sexual (ie, rating:general) artwork of young girls should not be tagged as loli" so probably not?

viliml said in forum #444598:

Makes me wonder, is there any point at which text-only references could qualify a post for the loli tag?

For the record, I disagreed with loli for post #11542780 because I didn't think she looked young enough. If she looked younger, then the dialog would most likely be enough (after translation, that is; the post wasn't translated when it was originally asked about).

1 266 267 268 269 270 271