How do I tag this?

Posted under Tags

jimgig said in forum #443945:

A lot of Kanokoga's Frieren drawings colour her hair in such a way that it appears far more pink than it does white, such as in post #11525353 or post #11522576. If I come across this situation in the future, should I tag these as pink hair, or should I leave the hair colour untagged? Tagging these as white hair feels like a bit of a stretch, even though that's her canonical hair colour.

Tag what you see is the prevailing rule for tagging, so if it doesn't look white it shouldn't be tagged as white. I would tag the posts you listed as purple hair myself, though pink hair could also work, especially for the first one. Alternate hair color could also apply.

Placeholder1996 said in forum #443947:

Tag what you see is the prevailing rule for tagging, so if it doesn't look white it shouldn't be tagged as white. I would tag the posts you listed as purple hair myself, though pink hair could also work, especially for the first one. Alternate hair color could also apply.

Makes sense, thanks.
Yeah, how pink or purple his Frieren's hair turns out really seems to depend on how he shades it. post #11525389 is very much on the pink side, whereas the...light purple? blue? in post #10344401 for me does a better job of suggesting white hair under specific lighting conditions than most of his art does. Some of it in his Marathon fanart in particular is so strongly coloured that it honestly reminds me of old superhero comics or John Higgins.

post #10168086 is currently tagged as 2girls and futanari. However, if you look closely, the redhead seems to have a very flat chest (notice the position of the nipple piercing), slightly broader shoulders than the brunette, and no indication of female genitalia. Should this be a trap instead?
The commentary doesn't help, but this artist is otherwise not known for drawing futa content, while they do have a bunch of trap content.

Similarly, post #9848907 literally has text saying "I'm a boy", and is also tagged as 2girls and futanari. Would trap plus male with breasts not be more accurate, or should we still go with "tag what you see" and disregard the artist's intent?
(Their most recent post also has breast enlargement on a trap.)

fgbooru said in forum #444437:

post #10168086 is currently tagged as 2girls and futanari. However, if you look closely, the redhead seems to have a very flat chest (notice the position of the nipple piercing), slightly broader shoulders than the brunette, and no indication of female genitalia. Should this be a trap instead?
The commentary doesn't help, but this artist is otherwise not known for drawing futa content, while they do have a bunch of trap content.

Pixiv tags suggest it’s a trap. I changed the tags accordingly.

aster1a said in forum #444442:

Pixiv tags suggest it’s a trap. I changed the tags accordingly.

Thanks. Going by Pixiv tags, the other post actually has both "otokonoko" (trap) and "shemale", which I believe is usually converted to futanari on Danbooru, correct me if I'm wrong.
Seeing it has both, that makes it even harder to decide. I still think trap + male with breasts would be better.

1 644 645 646 647 648 649