Posted under General
post #11521857
post #11521877
post #11521897
post #11521925
post #11521943
post #11521947
Are short simple gifs frowned upon?
These are the Kasane Teto ghost animations from the MV Obake Taiken/Ghost Experience by Satsuki. They were distributed by him with permission from their artist Kasaki Sakura on Twitter through Dropbox.
I feel a bit confused as post #11521836 by Kasaki Sakura got approved, but none of the actual animations they made for the MV.
mkjioz said in forum #444391:
[..]
This is probably just one of those cases where the post slipped under the radar, you should appeal stuff like this first so it has a second chance to be seen by approvers. I've undeleted all of them.
Mr.Ritsuka said in forum #444396:
New Apoeals：
post #11521541
post #11521496post #11521541：
I would especially wanted to talk about post #11521541. How come its child post managed to stay due to it being uploaded by a contributor,while post #11521541,being its parent post and a more completed version to post #11521584 got deleted ? Their only difference was that the post #11521584 was the textless version of post #11521541.post #11521496：
I did not find serious errors on the anatomy or the quality.
This is the exact same thing you posted an hour before. I'm pretty sure you were told not to do that in the past.
Blank_User said in forum #444401:
This is the exact same thing you posted an hour before. I'm pretty sure you were told not to do that in the past.
Well,I was tried to make a new reply,but only to find out that I couldn’t delete the previous reply.
Meaning you tried to remove an older version of the post to make a new one for visibility, which isn't okay either. Feedback is voluntary; stop reposting your appeals and feedback requests frequently, post it once and let it be. I'm going to start deleting repeated posts from you since you have a history of doing this. Other people are looking for feedback as well and it's unfair to them if you keep reposting things you've already requested not that long ago.
WRS said in forum #444400:
This is probably just one of those cases where the post slipped under the radar, you should appeal stuff like this first so it has a second chance to be seen by approvers. I've undeleted all of them.
Oh, okay, will keep that in mind.
Thank you for the reply, commentary, and action.
Are my things just not welcome on danbooru?
they use AI but many poses and features are hand drawn. you wouldn't be able to simply prompt these into existence, I spent hours redrawing frames, and fixing things. many of the poses through out the videos were almost completely hand drawn in krita, it's mostly the animation that uses AI. They still aren't perfect but a lot of hand drawn work went into them.
if this style of content isn't welcome here just let me know and i'll stop uploading them at all.
WRS said in forum #444403:
Meaning you tried to remove an older version of the post to make a new one for visibility, which isn't okay either. Feedback is voluntary; stop reposting your appeals and feedback requests frequently, post it once and let it be. I'm going to start deleting repeated posts from you since you have a history of doing this. Other people are looking for feedback as well and it's unfair to them if you keep reposting things you've already requested not that long ago.
OK,I will keep this in mind.
Wanted to get some feedback on why this wasn't approved. Well drawn, nice coloring and shading, etc. Just as good as the rest of milaart12's art, so it kind of feels like maybe it was overlooked or missed by approvers that would like it? 
Updated by sakurada ichigo
post #11487451
This one has good quality similar to artists other works, and also since Arsenal lost i just wanted to see if this one could get accepted as consolation :,)
post #8605827
post #8605817
The rest of this series of works by the artist are all accepted this ones have similar quality, they deserve another look
post #7856947
This one deserves another look as well, i think the quality is more than decent enough to get another look
Hello, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved? Please give a second chance:
post #6897983
post #7270792
post #6193458
Updated by SidBarrett
post #9546722
post #9546689
post #9546642
post #9546613
post #9546585
post #9546581
post #9546530
post #9546522
post #9546518
Hello, I edited these unapproved posts. Please review them again.
Updated by yssuperyu
yssuperyu said in forum #444469:
[...]
I'm not an approver so I can't speak on the image's quality, but you should always be linking the source you got the image from. A few of them towards the bottom have the source missing. See help:image source if you need some help.
It also looks like there was a duplicate or two, which shouldn't be uploaded.
Hello!
I would like to get some information as to why they weren't approved and some advice about these two posts:
Thanks in advance and sorry for disturbing!
Greetings
I wanted to ask why was this post not approved
Thanks
Any reason why this Emilia post didn't go through? Looks pretty good to me
I'd like to ask why post #11525311, post #11525324, and post #10726013 were not approved.
I'd especially like to ask about post #10726013 in more detail.
It is an artwork by Shinichi Hozuma, the artist of the manga/anime Makai Gakuen. I believe it is a fairly representative and artistically notable work, especially considering it comes from the 1990s.
When I uploaded it, I failed to properly indicate the artist and the time period, which was my mistake. (I was not sure how to add a new artist tag.)
I'd like to ask whether similar works by this artist would have a chance of being approved if I upload them again with the correct artist attribution and appropriate tags for the work's era and source.
Thank you for your time.
zenegg said in forum #444611:
I'd especially like to ask about post #10726013 in more detail.
@zenegg I fixed the artist tag you created. Please read help:artists to learn how to make new artist tags correctly. Also, make sure to use underscores to separate the names and keep in mind that Japanese artists will usually have the surname listed first.
You still need to add a source for your image. Did you get it off a website or did you scan it yourself? And if you did scan it, you should add self-scan and the specific work you scanned it from (the name of the artbook, magazine, etc.).
We don't normally tag when something was created. The closest we have are year tags (which do not apply to this post since the image isn't themed around a particular year) and artstyle tags (1980s_(style), 1990s_(style), etc.).
Also, I'm not qualified to comment on the art quality since I'm not an Approver, but I couldn't help but notice some odd blurriness on the left arm and the crotch. Were those present in the original artwork? Was it a bad scan? Note that third-party_edits are generally not allowed.
