post #10809259
Flagged for "suspect artist". The prior posts that where flagged from this artist where not proven as AI.
Posted under General
post #10809259
Flagged for "suspect artist". The prior posts that where flagged from this artist where not proven as AI.
post #11543080 Hatsuboshi logo is completely fucked up. For reference, post #11043045 has a correct logo
post #11543075 Braid looks bad, some of the hair around the braid looks bad, weird distortions around her ahoge.
post #9837406 The girl on the right's hair ribbon/bow looks very bizarre, in a way that vaguely looks like post #9793882 but completely misunderstood. A lock of her hair flows into the other girl's eyebrow
post #9921650 Hard to explain exactly what's wrong, but a lot of her bands and hair on the top of her head just look bad, a lot of the lines don't flow in reasonable ways
wavedash said in forum #444422:
post #11543080 Hatsuboshi logo is completely fucked up. For reference, post #11043045 has a correct logo
post #11543075 Braid looks bad, some of the hair around the braid looks bad, weird distortions around her ahoge.
post #9837406 The girl on the right's hair ribbon/bow looks very bizarre, in a way that vaguely looks like post #9793882 but completely misunderstood. A lock of her hair flows into the other girl's eyebrow
post #9921650 Hard to explain exactly what's wrong, but a lot of her bands and hair on the top of her head just look bad, a lot of the lines don't flow in reasonable ways
Yes, AI.
post #9725260: bad window.
post #10117633 is a little blurry, and style is different with post #10257142(the post seems not AI).
And see asset #48670140 and asset #48670162(pixiv #135514188).
If I see an artist with all post AI-generated and deleted, can I add 'AI prompter. Do not upload.' to his wiki page?
The artist I'm talking about: fanz_boy69
post #11372289 Zipper tab melts into the hair, and the rest of the zipper track shows telltale signs of AI meltyness.
post #11407885 Her right earring doesn't match the left earring and sorta melts into the skin around it.
This user's two other posts on the site are too low-quality to pick out clear AI examples so I'm going to link some of their twitter posts.
https://x.com/InakiHere/status/2053943228421054858/ Jean bottoms meld into ripped leggings. Buttons are fucked up.
https://x.com/InakiHere/status/2056842334286094550/ D.Va's logo is messed up
https://x.com/InakiHere/status/2057567107747881073/ Jean button(?) and blue iris is messed up.
There's no way klopsiak isn't mostly ai-generated art now...right?
I was just looking through their artist tag and saw how illogical and melted the details are on one of their recent images:
post #11552753
Like, the non-circular melted cat choker, the strange random details in the hair that look generated, the eyes have random...lines? Cracks? Lines everywhere that don't even make sense, even if it was colored over a sketch. It looks like so much of their work is ai-generated (at least now?), then they just use Clip Studio brushes (like halftone dots) in spots at random to make it look like it was drawn.
Not only that, but a CRAP load of their images are only pixels away from being SDXL resolutions. Here's some examples:
SDXL resolution (832x1216):
post #11533109 (840x1200)
post #11520141 (830x1195)
post #11175865 (829x1199)
post #11340117 (800x1200)
post #11275439 (800x1200)
post #11127375 (800x1197)
SDXL resolution (768x1152):
post #11460933 (737x1159)
post #11140440 (789x1124)
SDXL resolution (1024x1024):
post #11142829 (1012x1016)
post #11098828 (1080x1000)
Hell, even some of their old work that looks less "AI" still looks like it was ai-assisted through upscaling. For example:
post #9804700
Look at the white lace on the panties. It's quite literally riddled with upscaling artifacts and melted details.
Here's another one of their older artworks that STILL looks like it was at least upscaled by AI, judging by the melted thigh strap details:
post #7824966
I don't believe for a second most of their new work (and even some old stuff) is fully legitimate 
Updated by sakurada ichigo
https://www.pixiv.net/users/32347681
Is this a real artist?
sakurada_ichigo said in forum #444793:
There's no way klopsiak isn't mostly ai-generated art now...right?
See forum #440714 for some discussion on this artist. Personally, I think their newer stuff qualifies as AI-assisted, not fully AI-generated. Unfortunately, I don't feel like tagging them because I find their art so ugly that I don't want to stare at it more than I already have
wavedash said in forum #444860:
See forum #440714 for some discussion on this artist. Personally, I think their newer stuff qualifies as AI-assisted, not fully AI-generated. Unfortunately, I don't feel like tagging them because I find their art so ugly that I don't want to stare at it more than I already have
I don't mind doing it. I'll look through their stuff and using my best judgement, tag the stuff that looks ai-assisted
sakurada_ichigo said in forum #444888:
I don't mind doing it. I'll look through their stuff and using my best judgement, tag the stuff that looks ai-assisted
Okay, I finished tagging all the art that looked ai-assisted and here's what I found didn't look altered:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=klopsiak+-ai-assisted+&z=5
Some of these could still be ai-assisted, but I didn't feel certain enough about them to warrant the tag.
Updated by sakurada ichigo
hdk5 said in forum #444824:
https://www.pixiv.net/users/32347681
Is this a real artist?
Yes.
1. 1-3 months an artwork. It can explain his art style is a bit different.
2. Can't find AI artifacts.
BMPT said in forum #444879:
asset #48704362
asset #48704363
Same guy
artist is Park Jin Kwang
The source is just a twitter repost. He has an Artstation featuring his work.
Making sure this is not AI (first upload by this account).
MaskedAvenger said in forum #445000:
Making sure this is not AI (first upload by this account).
in my opinion not only is it Not AI, but I see a lot of little things that feel like only a human could do, especially with the coloring outside the lines. but that's just my opinion.
sakurada_ichigo said in forum #444793:
There's no way klopsiak isn't mostly ai-generated art now...right?
[...]
I don't believe for a second most of their new work (and even some old stuff) is fully legitimate
I decided not to say anything last time this guy came up but at the time I was doing some research on my own.
I had a friend who's really good at spotting AI and by complete coincidence he's subbed to their Patreon so I got a tad of an inside angle to this klop guy.
my opinion is that post #9364489 was the last thing that he drew legit, and everything afterwards is Fully generated or heavily Assisted. imthe resolution and quality is way higher than the mess he's been putting out since. it's also the last thing he's posted on his Pixiv and my friend confirmed it's the last piece he's ever put out a WIP for.
My friend also said he put a message saying he stopped WIPs because he's juggling between 2 "art styles" which I believe is cope for his heavily assisted work like post #9804700 and the fully generated stuff we get today.
The works posted on his patreon are pretty much an exact copy, both quality and resolution-wise of the works uploaded on twitter and thus here. of course this here is weak evidence but it makes sense given everything else.
sorry for the Essay. the TL;DR Im almost positive that klopsiak is a Prompter and should be flagged off this site. I didn't say much at the time because some approvers had different opinions at the time and my friend I been mentioning doesn't think he's a prompter.
MaskedAvenger said in forum #445000:
Making sure this is not AI (first upload by this account).
Not AI.
NO_AI_ON_DANBOORU said in forum #437549:
asset #48123613 (post #11289017 and post #11289019), this is ai.
I missed this reply. Thanks for the analysis. (Side note: are there notifications for forum replies anywhere?)
Looks like this "artist" is just LARPing and I fell for an elaborate hoax after all. Sucks for my ratio, so I'm upset as it was a good-faith upload. Guess I should have asked here first. Hindsight 20/20.
sakura_mikan_(chirizakura) has some posts flagged for AI (post #9578333, post #6983801) but they're an old artist and have many other active images.
Talulah said in forum #445193:
sakura_mikan_(chirizakura) has some posts flagged for AI (post #9578333, post #6983801) but they're an old artist and have many other active images.
Yeah, I really don’t see enough there to support calling it AI. The skirt pleats aren’t all that nonsensical to me and it’s not like artists need AI to draw weird anatomy.
