Massonia said in forum #443282:
Worth of S?
I'd say yes too, it's showing quite clearly even at a glance.
Posted under General
Massonia said in forum #443282:
Worth of S?
I'd say yes too, it's showing quite clearly even at a glance.
post #11507034
Is the partially visible vulva blatant enough to be Q?
artms said in forum #443441:
post #11507034
Is the partially visible vulva blatant enough to be Q?
no
Placeholder1996 said in forum #443972:
post #11350020 S/Q
S
sensitive or questionable?
thesongisover_2 said in forum #444025:
sensitive or questionable?
Questionable. Topless females are almost always at least Q, even when viewed from behind or with the nipples covered.
Discord disagrees whether this is Explicit guro or just some Sensitive body horror
ion288 said in forum #444319:
Discord disagrees whether this is Explicit guro or just some Sensitive body horror
I'd say the latter. I'd say guro focuses on much more extreme depictions of organs and blood.
rainyd said in forum #444320:
I'd say the latter. I'd say guro focuses on much more extreme depictions of organs and blood.
Even without any actual organs, the inside of the skin still looks like exposed muscle tissue. I think S is too low for this.
Guys, what's the line between G and S? The wiki said it's 'focusing' on certain body parts. But practically some posts, like a general figure of body, or event portraid, which characters' bodies are just secondary, I tagged them G, and being told did it wrong. Should I raise the standard from 'focus' to 'exist'?
BMPT said in forum #444367:
Guys, what's the line between G and S? The wiki said it's 'focusing' on certain body parts. But practically some posts, like a general figure of body, or event portraid, which characters' bodies are just secondary, I tagged them G, and being told did it wrong. Should I raise the standard from 'focus' to 'exist'?
Just read the goddamn howto:rate, it explains basically everything. Why did you even rate post #11534311 as G?
BMPT said in forum #444367:
Guys, what's the line between G and S? The wiki said it's 'focusing' on certain body parts. But practically some posts, like a general figure of body, or event portraid, which characters' bodies are just secondary, I tagged them G, and being told did it wrong. Should I raise the standard from 'focus' to 'exist'?
G is for 100% SFW images. Most of the posts listed in your feedback don't even come close.
MyonMyonMyonMyonMyonMyon said in forum #444369:
Just read the goddamn howto:rate, it explains basically everything. Why did you even rate post #11534311 as G?
That was a mistake. What about post #11302010 ? Is the problem with thigh or back?
BMPT said in forum #444381:
That was a mistake. What about post #11302010 ? Is the problem with thigh or back?
The back, the high side_slit + clothing cutout combo on the side of the dress, and the strap slip.
post #11544237 G or S? Wholesome enough portrait but the pet play borders on mild fetish content.
Diet_Soda said in forum #444468:
post #11544237 G or S? Wholesome enough portrait but the pet play borders on mild fetish content.
I would still rate it G.
post #11558894
G or S?