Posted under General
Just a thought, but would make blacklisting exponentially easier
also, when it comes to multipart tags, like "teamwork penis" instead of making it one line of a tag, have it show up as "teamwork, penis" separate tags, delineated by commas, so that one doesn't have to enter a totally new blacklist tag to accommodate blocking images of a penis, just cos they have the one item blocked, not the other item blocked.
Updated by Serlo
This thread doesn't make any sense at all.
What do you mean by "streamlining of tags"?
What do you mean by "multipart tags"?
There's no limit on blacklist tags, so why would you worry about having to add another one? Just put it on a new line in the blacklist settings.
If there are two different things, indicated by different tags, you want to blacklist, then it makes sense that you would have to blacklist those two tags. You sound like you want to put one tag in your blacklist and then have it magically know what the other tag you want to block is.
Why should teamwork be implicated to penis? post #1060269, post #180006, and post #1128565 have zero penises.
And if that implication was done, why would that "make blacklisting work again"? Since when was blacklisting not working in the first place, and why would implications of any tags have any effect on alleged blacklist bugs?
Updated by jjj14
I figured he meant teamwork_penis, whatever that is, since otherwise his complaint didn't make sense.
NagaSama, from what I can understand from your post, you may not know how blacklisting works. Separate tags need to be on separate lines. For example:
teamwork
penis
You won't see any posts tagged with teamwork OR penis. But if you want to blacklist posts that are tagged with both teamwork AND penis, they should be on the same line:
teamwork penis
In that case, you'll still see posts that are tagged with teamwork, or penis--you just won't see posts with BOTH tags.
*sigh*
Im going by the fact that there is no "safe mode" / "explicit mode" that I can find
Lets use this example instead as y'all apparently deal better with concrete examples rather than abstract.
There are a plethora of cum_on_*insert body area here* tags
Lets say that certain images are not tagged with "cum" but are tagged with "cum_on_*"
now do you see what I am talking account.
Do you not see with the plethora of tags out there for erotica how asinine a blocklist gets lol?
NagaSama said:
Im going by the fact that there is no "safe mode" / "explicit mode" that I can find
Rating:s, rating:q, and rating:e, can be blacklisted to taste.
NagaSama said:
Lets say that certain images are not tagged with "cum" but are tagged with "cum_on_*"
Those posts shouldn't exist, because all of those tags should have an implication to cum.
NagaSama said:
Yes well, as per reality, just because something should not exist, doesn't mean it does not ever exist.
If they exist, please actually tell us about it so we can fix them.
As mentioned previously, you can simply blacklist rating:e and rating:q, to get all the "safe" images. Blacklisting stuff like "swimsuit" and other similar tags should get you the "completely" safe images.
Aristocrat said:
If they exist, please actually tell us about it so we can fix them.As mentioned previously, you can simply blacklist rating:e and rating:q, to get all the "safe" images. Blacklisting stuff like "swimsuit" and other similar tags should get you the "completely" safe images.
AH, thats more like it. thanks for the rating:e tag
NagaSama said:
AH, thats more like it. thanks for the rating:e tag
It sounds like you were suggesting a feature that solved a problem you had, when there was already a solution in place. As a rule of thumb, rather than trying to solve the problem yourself, it's usually more productive to first:
1. read the documentation (wiki and help pages)
2. search the forums for others who've had your problem
3. ask in the forum for help with your problem
Only then is it productive to discuss either a better solution, or documenting the solution better.
