gloom (symbol)

Posted under Tags

hasu_no_tokimeki said:

BUR #51287 has been rejected.

mass update gloom_(symbol) -gloom_(expression) -> gloom_(expression) -gloom_(symbol)
nuke gloom_(symbol)

This seems redundant. Only 3 results for gloom_(symbol) -gloom_(expression).

@hongpol explain yourself. Why make gloom (symbol) when gloom (expression) already exists?

A gloomy expression on the face and a gloomy symbol on the head can be completely separated. It might just be that there are shadows on the face but no symbols on the head.

That's what shaded face is for. The divide seems completely forced on your part. Sounds like this should've been discussed first and proposed through a favgroup instead of being created without discussion and hijacking other tags' definitions to suit your needs, something which you are still actively doing as I write this post. Same with every single other hyperspecific tag you've made in the past few days that has no wiki page.

This shit is getting out of hand. @hongpol You really need to start tabling discussions for new tags on the forum before you go and make them or understand what tags are about before unilaterally mass updating a bunch of posts with them. Not just that but now all that gardening was pointless if you're going to manually nuke it - still without discussion - and not even replace it with a better tag if necessary, or go around polluting random tags like you're doing for sound effect.

1