I am very impressed by the attention paid to the contractions, the way her body seizes and twitches at the moment of climax. This was the most satisfying aspect. The automatic, instinctive bucking of her hips especially. No crazy water sports here; just pure physiology - beautiful!
Nah. Voted down dude is completely right. Traps and crossdressers exist.
This definitely seems like a case of a gender neutral tag, unless there’s some other identifier I’m missing. Or the artist tagged it I guess.
Otherwise, rtag what you see right?
For the same reason we assume a disembodied penis to be attached to a male despite the existence of futas (not irl, obviously), "if they're wearing pantyhose it's likely they're a girl" is a reasonable assumption as it is far greater in occurrence. Reasonable assumptions are an acceptable means of tagging.
To add numbers to it, pantyhose 1boy solo returns just over 3000 images, pantyhose 1girl solo meanwhile returns almost 260k. One of these cases is drastically more common, making it fair to assume the person out of frame here is a girl.
Nah. Voted down dude is completely right. Traps and crossdressers exist.
This definitely seems like a case of a gender neutral tag, unless there’s some other identifier I’m missing. Or the artist tagged it I guess.
Otherwise, rtag what you see right?
Calm down, friend, relax. Since the person's face isn't shown, you can imagine whatever you want. I myself imagine a futanari when it's art with just a floating penis or nakadashi.
Leave a comment