Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? mon (manarestra) 64

Copyright

  • ? azur lane 152k

Characters

  • ? pola (azur lane) 591
  • ? ↳ pola (seaside coincidence) (azur lane) 313

General

  • ? 1girl 7.9M
  • ? 2boys 436k
  • ? :>= 6.8k
  • ? after fellatio 7.7k
  • ? afterimage 17k
  • ? ahegao 26k
  • ? bar censor 222k
  • ? bikini 650k
  • ? bikini pull 9.5k
  • ? blush 3.9M
  • ? breasts 4.7M
  • ? censored 616k
  • ? clothes pull 103k
  • ? cum 323k
  • ? cum in mouth 38k
  • ? cum string 11k
  • ? dutch angle 153k
  • ? fellatio 91k
  • ? female pubic hair 120k
  • ? greyscale 653k
  • ? hand up 520k
  • ? heart 837k
  • ? heart-shaped pupils 113k
  • ? hetero 746k
  • ? huge breasts 304k
  • ? long hair 5.8M
  • ? monochrome 807k
  • ? multiple boys 652k
  • ? navel 1.5M
  • ? nipples 1.1M
  • ? official alternate costume 516k
  • ? oral 111k
  • ? penis 556k
  • ? plump 41k
  • ? pubic hair 178k
  • ? pubic hair peek 8.7k
  • ? shiny skin 151k
  • ? sidelocks 874k
  • ? solo focus 472k
  • ? stray pubic hair 5.5k
  • ? surrounded by penises 25k
  • ? swimsuit 852k
  • ? symbol-shaped pupils 233k
  • ? testicles 129k
  • ? tongue 522k
  • ? tongue out 392k
  • ? topless female 85k
  • ? twintails 1.2M
  • ? v 219k

Meta

  • ? commentary 2.9M
  • ? ↳ untranslatable commentary 295k
  • ? highres 7.6M
  • ? ↳ absurdres 2.7M

Information

  • ID: 4567681
  • Uploader: dean exia »
  • Date: almost 5 years ago
  • Size: 3.36 MB .jpg (2894x4093) »
  • Source: x.com/MaNaResTra/status/1401175377846751243 »
  • Rating: Explicit
  • Score: 97
  • Favorites: 139
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
Resized to 29% of original (view original)
pola (azur lane) drawn by mon_(manarestra)

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • 🍖

    • ‹ prev Search: status:any next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    Jimmani20
    almost 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    Next time please tag pictures correctly , this should have been in my blacklist but it wasn't

    -7 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    anhdunghisinh
    almost 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    Jimmani20 said:

    Next time please tag pictures correctly , this should have been in my blacklist but it wasn't

    Why people downvote this comment? The author of this post has responsiblity to tag the post correctly as much as possible, this is how wiki page works.

    -11 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Jerseyboy95
    almost 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    Some of them freaky Pasta girls will try and suck your soul out if you're not careful. I had something of an experience.

    Updated by Jerseyboy95 almost 5 years ago

    -2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    NNescio
    almost 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    Jimmani20 said:

    Next time please tag pictures correctly , this should have been in my blacklist but it wasn't

    anhdunghisinh said:

    Why people downvote this comment? The author of this post has responsiblity to tag the post correctly as much as possible, this is how wiki page works.

    Because the original uploader already tagged the whole thing pretty much to Level 3 with 43 tags. It was already more than enough a good job.

    Complaining someone missed, what, multiple penises? Not every people remember that kind of tag unless they upload images with, well, multiple cocks on a frequent basis.

    Complaining someone missed 2boys (and by extension multiple_boys)? In hindsight this should have been tagged with those (because of the nature of the work), but for most non-porn posts most people don't bother to count unidentifiable out of frame people. The 'mistake' was perfectly understandable.

    And that's why people downvoted that comment. Original uploader made a good, detailed effort to exhaustively tag most taggable elements in this image, 'missed' just ONE tag (or two if you don't count the implication) that a lot of people would exclude anyway on other posts (if not because of the specific nature of this work), then gets whinged at because of missing that ONE tag. Not to mention said uploader is also a senior user with a long history of contributing to this site.

    Updated by NNescio almost 5 years ago

    5 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link

    Leave a comment

    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /