Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? ankake hitokaji 25

Copyright

  • ? touhou 949k

Character

  • ? ushizaki urumi 1.0k

General

  • ? 1girl 6.7M
  • ? :d 617k
  • ? animal ears 1.3M
  • ? animal print 77k
  • ? black hair 1.7M
  • ? blurry 256k
  • ? blurry background 149k
  • ? breasts 3.9M
  • ? cleavage 1.1M
  • ? cow ears 20k
  • ? cow girl 11k
  • ? cow horns 19k
  • ? cow print 21k
  • ? cow tail 9.0k
  • ? haori 19k
  • ? horns 529k
  • ? huge breasts 246k
  • ? japanese clothes 433k
  • ? looking at viewer 3.8M
  • ? multicolored hair 831k
  • ? open mouth 2.7M
  • ? red eyes 1.4M
  • ? red horns 19k
  • ? short hair 2.5M
  • ? shorts 510k
  • ? smile 3.3M
  • ? solo 5.6M
  • ? split-color hair 19k
  • ? statue 7.4k
  • ? tail 899k
  • ? yellow shorts 7.8k

Meta

  • ? commentary 1.7M
  • ? highres 6.1M

Information

  • ID: 5914835
  • Uploader: Below273 »
  • Date: over 2 years ago
  • Size: 1.57 MB .png (1024x1366) »
  • Source: pixiv.net/artworks/101080977 »
  • Rating: Sensitive
  • Score: 13
  • Favorites: 16
  • Status: Deleted

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary

This post was deleted for the following reason:

Unapproved in three days after returning to moderation queue (over 2 years ago)
Resized to 83% of original (view original)
ushizaki urumi (touhou) drawn by ankake_hitokaji

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • |
  • Translated
  • 無題

    Untitled

    • ‹ prev Search: user:Below273 status:deleted next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    Cholesterolicon
    over 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    Lol what? Yeah it's not a masterpiece but quality check?
    At least list a reason why.

    -5 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    iridescent slime
    over 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    I'm not the one who flagged this, but "quality check" is perfectly acceptable as a flag reason. Flaggers may enumerate a post's flaws if they choose to, but there has never been a rule requiring this. If a post is good enough, it'll get approved regardless of the flag reason.

    The image is borderline enough that I'd hesitate to flag it, but I don't think it should have skipped the moderation queue either. The face seems a little iffy and the hands are just bad. The coloring isn't terrible, but it has the vibe of an artist who's new to digital painting and is still learning effective shading techniques. The whole thing just seems a little amateurish and unpolished overall, and there's nothing particularly interesting about the subject or composition, so I'm surprised that anyone is rushing to defend it.

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /