I believe it's a first gen Suzuki Alto and not a Civic based on the cowl vents.
You're right. Also side mirros placement on the bonnet confirming it's an Alto (almost all Civic's side mirrors placed on each doors except CX-S and Country variants)
It looks like a regular full frame of Melander than Iguazu's Melander C3.
The head is closer to C3 on account of the wider front flat angle on forehead. However, it's missing the antenna block to the side that C3s are supposed to have. I assume it's an artist oversight with the forehead.
Please do not remove the "futa without pussy tag." This is what "newhalf" aliases to now. I don't think it's a good change but I did not make it.
From the wiki:
Visually similar to futanari with penis and testicles but no vagina. That is to say, the character has a female body but male sex organs.
This tag should be used if you can either visually confirm the character has no vagina or there is information that clearly supports that the character doesn't have one, such as the tags used in the source, the artist's commentary or indicators in the art itself that confirms the character is a newhalf. When in doubt use the futanari tag instead.
The character is wearing panties, so it's impossible to tell from the image whether or not they have a vagina. There is also no information at the source pertaining to this, so it defaults to futanari only.
The character is wearing panties, so it's impossible to tell from the image whether or not they have a vagina. There is also no information at the source pertaining to this, so it defaults to futanari only.
Please do not be sassy. In your own post, as you said:
such as the tags used in the source, the artist's commentary or indicators in the art itself that confirms the character is a newhalf.
The artist's commentary of this character is on their wiki page: nut-chan (xter) and on several of their images, such as this one: post #10610839
The rules, as I understand them, is to tag the characters with the tags that apply to them based on your knowledge of the character and what you see, not just the latter. After all, if it was just the latter, all of astolfo's posts would be "unknown gender"
I was only reminding you that you were asked to show what posts would apply to the new tag you're proposing in that thread, which would be more productive than trying to fit the existing tag into what you want it to be.
The artist's commentary of this character is on their wiki page: nut-chan (xter) and on several of their images, such as this one: post #10610839
That first one is just a wiki description (which would be more credible if you provided a link to that character description you posted, but I digress). Commentary applies to the specific post it's attached to, not every post of the character. Your other example does have artist commentary, but
Nong Nut is fulfilling his duty as a Thai man.
it doesn't say anything about his genitals (assuming you translated it correctly).
The rules, as I understand them, is to tag the characters with the tags that apply to them based on your knowledge of the character and what you see, not just the latter. After all, if it was just the latter, all of astolfo's posts would be "unknown gender"
You mean ambiguous gender. And you're wrong. There's plenty of Astolfo posts that are not ambiguous. And the 1boy, 1girl, and 1other tags are not in the same category as futanari and related tags.
The general guideline is "tag what you see, not what you know." What you're saying directly contradicts the second half. There are exceptions to this, but they are mainly for things that can't be reduced to a concrete physical description.
And while the wiki does say artist commentary can be used (again, for the specific post, not for every post), it's a holdover from when the tag was still called newhalf and I think it would be better to remove that part from the wiki.
Leave a comment