Posted under General
Cluless said:
I know this was deleted, got labelled poor quality and got -4 on score but is there actually anything good about this picture at all or is it just all bad and should be purged from the site for good?
Images normally don't get purged, only if they break the rules. We have a lot of very very poor quality images that we don't delete.
Cluless said:
I know this was deleted, got labelled poor quality and got -4 on score but is there actually anything good about this picture at all or is it just all bad and should be purged from the site for good?
Images don't get expunged unless they're illegal or borderline illegal.
Hello.
I was wondering if something could be done about it with the following images:
post #4578651
post #4578302
post #4855035
post #4798177
Durpala said:
Hello.
I was wondering if something could be done about it with the following images:
post #4578302 - Off-topic: not anime-styled or of an anime-styled copyright
post #4855035 - Just look at those hands.
Hello. Why was this deleted? It's official art from Megami magazine
post #4909589
Official Art doesn't mean something gets automatically approved. In this case, the perspective is really weird. Her upper body looks weird and her left arm (our pov) doesn't seem correct either.
Hi, wonder what's the issue with this one, the coloring or something?
post #4906233
Manhe said:
Hi, wonder what's the issue with this one, the coloring or something?
post #4906233
I guess, it has poor shading
Hello, was wondering why those got deleted?
post #4917163
post #4914978
post #4914977
worldrejector said:
Hello, was wondering why those got deleted?
post #4917163
post #4914978
post #4914977
post #4917163 is a duplicate. Dupes don't get approved very often.
Talulah said:
post #4917163 is a duplicate. Dupes don't get approved very often.
I knew that but I have seen a looot of dupes with different sides for the source (pixiv, Twitter etc) so I thought that was a okay thing to do, specially since the artist re-uploaded it himself and the old source leads to an inactive account. Don't think it would have hurt anyone to approve that.
worldrejector said:
I knew that but I have seen a looot of dupes with different sides for the source (pixiv, Twitter etc) so I thought that was a okay thing to do, specially since the artist re-uploaded it himself and the old source leads to an inactive account. Don't think it would have hurt anyone to approve that.
Most dupes you see are from inferior versions being uploaded on Twitter and a superior version being posted later to pixiv, for example. And it is a bit of a pain at the moment, but fixes are being worked on for it. In the meantime, instead of uploading inferior/identical quality images, it's generally better to just leave a comment on the image we have with the other source.
worldrejector said:
I knew that but I have seen a looot of dupes with different sides for the source (pixiv, Twitter etc) so I thought that was a okay thing to do, specially since the artist re-uploaded it himself and the old source leads to an inactive account. Don't think it would have hurt anyone to approve that.
Just remember
nonamethanks said:
Uploading is a trial and error process. Don't get scared, it's like that for everyone. It's easy to get a grasp of what's acceptable quality once you get going.
Where did I go wrong this time?
Talulah said: Most dupes you see are from inferior versions being uploaded on Twitter and a superior version being posted later to pixiv, for example. And it is a bit of a pain at the moment, but fixes are being worked on for it. In the meantime, instead of uploading inferior/identical quality images, it's generally better to just leave a comment on the image we have with the other source.
Will do.
Naikun 2ndImpact said: Just remember
nonamethanks said:
Uploading is a trial and error process. Don't get scared, it's like that for everyone. It's easy to get a grasp of what's acceptable quality once you get going.
Not scared of posts getting deleted but I do feel sometimes it's like Russian roulette which gets approved and which gets the bullet. Like I don't see why post #4914978 got labelled poor quality when I have seen worse get accepted already. Well your site, your rules.
@OmegaStarNeo said:
Where did I go wrong this time?
It's very amateurish. While the artist had a lot of good ideas in mind with the composition, the execution could be better.
worldrejector said:
Like I don't see why post #4914978 got labelled poor quality when I have seen worse get accepted already.
The hands and arms are pretty bad: her left hand (top) is kinda narrow and looks too long, her right hand (bottom) looks way too small and just bad overall. Her arms are also too thin, especially when compared to the thighs. The rest is kinda meh.
Note: “There’s worse art accepted” is never a good argument on Danbooru and using it will only increase your chances of getting ignored. ;) If you find posts that you think are bad, flag them for review.
