Umbrella tag for plant hair/wings/legs/etc and plant people and creatures

Posted under Tags

BUR #41261 has been rejected.

create implication plant_hair -> plant_body_part
create implication plant_ears -> plant_body_part
create implication plant_tail -> plant_body_part

We currently only have scattered plant body part tags for individual body parts and the plant monster tag which isn't used for monsters as much as any cute plant creatures. To avoid the intricacies of plant boy/girl vs animal vs monster vs creature I think plant being or flora fauna is a better name. The reason I am not implying the above to that is that it can be very subtle post #2570923

BUR #41266 has been rejected.

create implication plant_girl -> plant_person
create implication plant_boy -> plant_person
create alias plant_animal -> plant_creature
create alias plant_monster -> plant_creature
create implication plant_person -> plant_being
create implication plant_creature -> plant_being

If people don't want to split between monsters and animals when non humanoid plant creatures.

blindVigil said:

I don't think any of these proposed tags are a good idea, you're trying to collect several very different things into a single search. Plant person and plant being are especially bad ideas.

Also plant animal is empty, so unless you're planning to fill that with something the implication in the second BUR is pointless.

Currently the "plant monster" tag is not being used for creatures that classify as "monsters" on this side (mostly being used for cute plant pokemon digimon) but there are also some "monster" type posts in the mix post #3924261 post #8403616. So plant animal is there if people want to be able to search for things like post #9033271 and post #3924261 seperately. Third option is if people just want all non humanoids as one thing.

Zalza said:

Currently the "plant monster" tag is not being used for creatures that classify as "monsters" on this side (mostly being used for cute plant pokemon digimon) but there are also some "monster" type posts in the mix post #3924261 post #8403616. So plant animal is there if people want to be able to search for things like post #9033271 and post #3924261 seperately. Third option is if people just want all non humanoids as one thing.

None of that really addresses the issue that plant animal is not an existing tag, and serves zero purpose in these BURs. You need to make the tag for anything you've said to matter, which is possibly something that should be discussed. Implicating an empty tag is not going to magically populate that tag.

It's as Vigil says. Make a favgroup for plant_creature, then propose a BUR to populate it as follows: "mass update favgroup:xxx -> plant_creature"

The only one of these tags I can see having any use at all is plant_creature, and even then it sounds to me like it'd be 98% Grass type Pokémon. But again, without that favgroup, there's no way to be sure of that.

blindVigil said:

None of that really addresses the issue that plant animal is not an existing tag, and serves zero purpose in these BURs. You need to make the tag for anything you've said to matter, which is possibly something that should be discussed. Implicating an empty tag is not going to magically populate that tag.

AngryZapdos said:

It's as Vigil says. Make a favgroup for plant_creature, then propose a BUR to populate it as follows: "mass update favgroup:xxx -> plant_creature"

The only one of these tags I can see having any use at all is plant_creature, and even then it sounds to me like it'd be 98% Grass type Pokémon. But again, without that favgroup, there's no way to be sure of that.

Fair enough, I admit I made this when very tired and looking back having the person and non person things together was pretty dumb too. Plant animal was more premptive in case people wanted to search for non humanoids but also keep cute digimon out of the search, that would also mean cleaning a bunch of the posts currently under plant monster and moving them under plant animal. But it's also possible to just change plant monster to plant creature as that's how it's already used. The wiki of plant monster and monster right now:

plant monster

A plant that moves, and can attack others. Usually, this involves a plant-like form of tentacles using vines. Other than this, or in conjunction with this, they may act like a pitcher plant, venus fly trap, or other predatory real-world plant, dragging characters into a deadly portion of the plant.

Plant monsters probably shouldn't be humanoid. Plant Girl is used for (feminine) humanoid plant monsters, while Plant Boy is used for (masculine) humanoid plant monsters.

See also

Monster

Something big, scary and non-human that quite probably has tentacles.

For creatures that don't seem appropriate to label as a monster (particularly those that are not big and scary), use the creature tag instead.

For the series, see Monster (manga).

For Japanese monsters, see Kaiju.

See also

Worth noting that a lot of the posts under plant monster also don't qualify as monster_girls based on the human faces rule.

blindVigil said:

I don't think any of these proposed tags are a good idea, you're trying to collect several very different things into a single search. Plant person and plant being are especially bad ideas.

I disagree on this, it's very logical people would like to search for plant people. Whether that should share one mega umbrella tag with plant creatures or just be plant_person or plant_creature should be a seperate bur tho.

BUR #41322 has been rejected.

create implication plant_girl -> plant_humanoid
create implication plant_boy -> plant_humanoid

I rejected the previous two burs dealing with this as they should have been seperated from the creature one. I wasn't sure wether to go with _person or _humanoid as we have miniperson but humanoid sounds better. If this goes through we should probably have a bur for things like elemtal humanoids and so on. Using the humanoid suffix would also allow for searching/blacklisting *_humanoid while *_person just catches a buns of sitting on person style tags.

Not going with _human because that would result in conflict with like elfs, that plant adventure time character, etc.

Zalza said:

BUR #41261 has been rejected.

create implication plant_hair -> plant_body_part
create implication plant_ears -> plant_body_part
create implication plant_tail -> plant_body_part

We currently only have scattered plant body part tags for individual body parts and the plant monster tag which isn't used for monsters as much as any cute plant creatures. To avoid the intricacies of plant boy/girl vs animal vs monster vs creature I think plant being or flora fauna is a better name. The reason I am not implying the above to that is that it can be very subtle post #2570923

I don't really get the downvotes for this, but people seem to hate it. Maybe they're just downvotes against the user rather than the BUR.

1