Inconsistent artstyle is what makes me suspicious of this post. Oh, I also noticed a few artifacts here and there like her belt for example.
I'm pretty confident this is AI. Her sash pattern is unnatural, especially that bottom vertical line that just ends in the middle of nowhere. The dashed lines around her chest look bad.
post #11391931 looks a bit suspicious to me. I'm not 100% sure and the tags on Pixiv don't say it's AI-gen either but at the same time i got fooled by that twice and accidentally uploaded AI-gen content.
Only the first ever upload is tagged AI-generated, a few more posts had the tag added and removed. The first four have been deleted/flagged with "AI-generated" as reason.
It seems to have started from this post edit, after which the first post was deleted and the others followed suit. Until post #9255075, which was approved following forum #353740.
So… is it all legit, all AI, or only a few AI posts and the rest is legit?
can someone check this artist post #11112966 very similar to akableak but idk if its just a artstyle copy, inconsistent style on pixiv
The artist talked to me about his artworks, he said he is'nt using AI. I half believe and half doubt, because AI in 2023 is shit(he start drawing in 2023), but he can remember his process 3 years ago, it's strange. and his artworks in 2023 is 1000 res, so i think he is ai assisted in 2023.
This artist has been getting uploaded recently without any tags for ai-generated or ai-assisted which I feel is a good time to question if he was ever actually an AI user. And if yes, how much of the art he posts now is AI.
can someone check this artist post #11112966 very similar to akableak but idk if its just a artstyle copy, inconsistent style on pixiv
One of their two posts currently tagged ai-assisted, post #7081761 from 2 years ago, has some suspicious hair. Part of her bangs are supposed to be pulled back into a French braid of some sort (I still don't really know the new tags for it) - see post #2684730 for reference. But I think their drawing of her completely misses this, there's just a weird mess by her forehead.
I think their change in artstyle is pretty gradual, it doesn't seem unusual to me for a beginner/hobbyist with no prior experience with art.
For reference, comment #2591609 is where the artist talks about their history. They say they've done tracing before, but not tracing AI, which seems plausible to me.
This artist has been getting uploaded recently without any tags for ai-generated or ai-assisted which I feel is a good time to question if he was ever actually an AI user. And if yes, how much of the art he posts now is AI.
Thats the artist name, non an AI watermark. Jewelry and leather mask looks a bit sus though. Is it AI?
It's the commissioner's name, the account shares their commissions. However the chains in the background are fine (made by an art brush), the mask personally looks coherent to me, no issues in both of their eyes or hair. I think this is human.
Idk if this is the right place to mention this, but since CC_Lin uses AI assist in his drawing process, shouldn't all his posts be tagged ai_assist for transparency? Example: post #10495186 or post #6328171 , if you look at his older illustrations, you'll realize he *was* a typical digital artist until he started implementing AI to speed up the process like making backgrounds or other corrections, im pretty sure 80% of his work is still manual, but that doesn't change the fact that he indeed uses AI tools