AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

VR-Man said in forum #441117:

post #11276812

Inconsistent artstyle is what makes me suspicious of this post.
Oh, I also noticed a few artifacts here and there like her belt for example.

I'm pretty confident this is AI. Her sash pattern is unnatural, especially that bottom vertical line that just ends in the middle of nowhere. The dashed lines around her chest look bad.

pixiv #143912884 has some terrible-looking drawstrings (?), pixiv #144708514 has more bad lines, especially on the right, pixiv #144699751 has some ugly wood/leather

ILikeTrainz said in forum #441053:

post #11391931 looks a bit suspicious to me. I'm not 100% sure and the tags on Pixiv don't say it's AI-gen either but at the same time i got fooled by that twice and accidentally uploaded AI-gen content.

I fonud some errors: asset #48392528
But this artist has proof: https://x.com/nallcia/status/2051295359381733842
But the proof is a bit weird: asset #48392652
And see pixiv #144407943, pixiv #144381875, pixiv #142929560. Citlali is so different that i don't think it is drawn by same guy.
Sandrone have more differences.
This artist was not drawing in 2023~2025.
I think 70% uses ai and edit (ai-assiated).

wavedash said in forum #441436:

Is xhanoart traced? I don't see any smoking guns, but twitter #2047061499680555195 has some weird inconsistencies between panels: https://slow.pics/c/XjdOz2aH

Her pussy, collarbone, hair, neck, and cheek move way more than necessary if you were drawing variants by hand.

Probably uses AI, at least AI coloring.

--------------------------

Now I have a PTSD to patreon. Because most ai slop creator have patreon account.

dovekiie said in forum #441449:

can someone check this artist post #11112966
very similar to akableak but idk if its just a artstyle copy, inconsistent style on pixiv

The artist talked to me about his artworks, he said he is'nt using AI. I half believe and half doubt, because AI in 2023 is shit(he start drawing in 2023), but he can remember his process 3 years ago, it's strange. and his artworks in 2023 is 1000 res, so i think he is ai assisted in 2023.

Updated by NO AI ON DANBOORU

dovekiie said in forum #441449:

can someone check this artist post #11112966
very similar to akableak but idk if its just a artstyle copy, inconsistent style on pixiv

One of their two posts currently tagged ai-assisted, post #7081761 from 2 years ago, has some suspicious hair. Part of her bangs are supposed to be pulled back into a French braid of some sort (I still don't really know the new tags for it) - see post #2684730 for reference. But I think their drawing of her completely misses this, there's just a weird mess by her forehead.

I think their change in artstyle is pretty gradual, it doesn't seem unusual to me for a beginner/hobbyist with no prior experience with art.

For reference, comment #2591609 is where the artist talks about their history. They say they've done tracing before, but not tracing AI, which seems plausible to me.

ion288 said in forum #441634:

post #11423942

Thats the artist name, non an AI watermark. Jewelry and leather mask looks a bit sus though. Is it AI?

It's the commissioner's name, the account shares their commissions. However the chains in the background are fine (made by an art brush), the mask personally looks coherent to me, no issues in both of their eyes or hair. I think this is human.

Idk if this is the right place to mention this, but since CC_Lin uses AI assist in his drawing process, shouldn't all his posts be tagged ai_assist for transparency? Example: post #10495186 or post #6328171 , if you look at his older illustrations, you'll realize he *was* a typical digital artist until he started implementing AI to speed up the process like making backgrounds or other corrections, im pretty sure 80% of his work is still manual, but that doesn't change the fact that he indeed uses AI tools

Updated by Kuroeffect

1 242 243 244 245 246 247