How do I tag this?

Posted under Tags

ziin1234 said in forum #441856:

post #10341372 (nsfw)

Based on this artist character's other posts, rather than sex_toy_replacing_penis, that seems to be meant as an odd-looking condom

If there's no objection I'll remove sex_toy_replacing_penis, I don't know if condom is right though

@ziin1234 tagging since some time has passed

Sex toy replacing penis seems correct. She has a chastity cage which blocks her penis, you can see the chastity cage emission below the dildo. I wouldn’t tag condom.

ziin1234 said in forum #442302:

When is watermark_grid not a too many watermarks ?

Too_many watermarks explained that it's meant for watermark noticeably obstructing, but the posts I saw doesn't feel consistent about what it means

I think they're too overlapping but distinct ideas. The key part of too many watermarks is that the watermarks need to visually obstruct the image. While this can happen with a watermark grid, it doesn't always happen. For example, in post #11402482, there is a watermark grid but they're very transparent, leaving the image largely viewable. Contrast that with post #11088155, which I would tag as both. Obviously, too many watermarks doesn't need to be a watermark grid.

Updated by Placeholder1996

post #11479826

Should I tag as real life? She's an e-thot with 57,000 followers, but I don't know if that counts as public enough to be a public figure. Especially since I never heard of her before now.

Could we perhaps add a rule clarificiation in real life for cases like her? Like if you have x number of followers, you qualify as a public figure due to being a minor e-celeb.

machan12 said in forum #442636:

post #11479826

Should I tag as real life? She's an e-thot with 57,000 followers, but I don't know if that counts as public enough to be a public figure. Especially since I never heard of her before now.

Could we perhaps add a rule clarificiation in real life for cases like her? Like if you have x number of followers, you qualify as a public figure due to being a minor e-celeb.

Personally, I would say it counts

machan12 said in forum #442636:

post #11479826

Should I tag as real life? She's an e-thot with 57,000 followers, but I don't know if that counts as public enough to be a public figure. Especially since I never heard of her before now.

Could we perhaps add a rule clarificiation in real life for cases like her? Like if you have x number of followers, you qualify as a public figure due to being a minor e-celeb.

It definitely counts. Having a "minimum follower count" rule would not make sense. You're not supposed to tag it on random people who could be *anyone*. This is fanart of a specific person with some sort of SNS presence, that already is enough to tell it's valid (and a chartag should be made too).

ANON_TOKYO said in forum #442642:

It definitely counts.

Adding to ANON TOKYO's point, real life as a tag is one users actually undertag in my experience. Many times I've run into cases where people will have tagged a real life person, even famous people, and not tag them as if they inherently have no copytag: post #10391899, post #9181345, post #7055667, post #8339679, post #5711665, post #3015924, post #8057959, post #7359542, post #6889908, post #1043517, post #342824, post #1150590, etc. all examples of posts which were not tagged real life, sometimes for extended periods of time, despite counting for the tag.