AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

Kuroeffect said in forum #441665:

Idk if this is the right place to mention this, but since CC_Lin uses AI assist in his drawing process, shouldn't all his posts be tagged ai_assist for transparency? Example: post #10495186 or post #6328171 , if you look at his older illustrations, you'll realize he *was* a typical digital artist until he started implementing AI to speed up the process like making backgrounds or other corrections, im pretty sure 80% of his work is still manual, but that doesn't change the fact that he indeed uses AI tools

Pick up when the artist start implementing AI before tagging them with ai-assisted. If an older post of theirs doesn't utilize AI, then don't tag it, only tag the ones that already using AI beforehand.

broistgruen. Before I flag all the posts, I would like to consult

>>> https://x.com/broistgruen/status/1967303110944289100 The houses look like crap
https://x.com/broistgruen/status/1949899050376896888
https://x.com/broistgruen/status/1965890909037535374

These posts are not published, but in my opinion they are the most obvious. There is also the very first post on Danbooru (post #10458201) where artifacts are visible in the eyes

Please, share your opinion.

StonerAnimeGayGirl said in forum #442199:

This artist posts a whole lot of art in a short timespan. I wanted to double-check if this was AI before uploading anything of theirs because while I don't think it is, that's just a general first impression glancing through and I would rather get a second opinion first as I'd rather be safe than sorry and I'd rather catch it now than after uploading:

https://bsky.app/profile/wanpai-liu.bsky.social

Not AI. Maybe the artist posted archived posts, or maybe reposter.