StarfishAtLarge said in forum #442657:
post #11459872 (S)
Don't really see any issue with this one.
Looks cute to me too, but I don't know if danbooru is more strict to non-web sources
Posted under General
StarfishAtLarge said in forum #442657:
post #11459872 (S)
Don't really see any issue with this one.
Looks cute to me too, but I don't know if danbooru is more strict to non-web sources
BMPT said in forum #442484:
Hi forum!
post #11444553
Upside-down sunk Kasumi from Blue Archive.post #11435320
Luxurious version of Haruna from Blue Archive.post #11444583
Backsight thigh-focused Kirino from Blue Archive. This one passed initially but somehow just got deleted.post #11230650
Echoo's impressionism-style Clear Bliss from Umamusume. This artist did a lot this kind of stuff.post #11310722
post #11366270
Kuba's two armed girls.Is he really from Cuba?post #11179385
Commented version of its parent, armed girl. I don't think it's a downgraded version since artist himself posted it.post #11305541
Eimi from Blue Archive.THIGH!post #11129993
Birthday pic for Satsuki from Blue Archive.post #11139181
Himari-Rio from Blue Archive.post #11319521
Gold bikini Haruna and Fuuka from Blue Archive.post #10757778
Christmas party of DEFY pack from Girls' Frontline.Haven't post for quite a while so the list might be too large :( Nah they are of different themes, parodies, styles and artists so please traverse them (if you'd like to).
favgroup #53271
There's some remaining in my 'scrapyard' but the recent favourable ones are above.
post #11305541 looks really good actually, I'm kinda impressed it was ignored by the staff
TheGamingRodent said in forum #442097:
Any reason why these didn't go through? Look okay to me
Maybe it's about anatomy wise? Not sure, the girl's arm looks a little off and the vtuber one has a long neck, again, not trying to be rude, just trying to answer why maybe they didn't go through
TheGamingRodent said in forum #442412:
post #11452269
post #11452259
post #11451721Can I have a reason why these didn't go through? They are very well drawn
post #11452259 looks good enough for me too, it looks cute
Kuroeffect said in forum #442718:
post #11452259 looks good enough for me too, it looks cute
If you are not an approver you should not be giving feedback in this thread.
Talulah said in forum #442719:
If you are not an approver you should not be giving feedback in this thread.
I thought the point of this thread was to voluntarily give feedback, ofc I'm not approver so I can't choose what does or doesn't get approved, but I'm just stating my personal opinion
Kuroeffect said in forum #442721:
I thought the point of this thread was to voluntarily give feedback, ofc I'm not approver so I can't choose what does or doesn't get approved, but I'm just stating my personal opinion
If you're not an approver (or even contributor) you don't have a good understanding of the modqueue. This should be evident enough from half your messages being some form of "I don't know, looks fine to me", which is completely unhelpful, or saying misleading things like
Kuroeffect said in forum #442712:
but I don't know if danbooru is more strict to non-web sources
This will just cause more confusion or lead people to think things that are acceptable to do are not.
Talulah said in forum #442722:
If you're not an approver (or even contributor) you don't have a good understanding of the modqueue. This should be evident enough from half your messages being some form of "I don't know, looks fine to me", which is completely unhelpful, or saying misleading things like
This will just cause more confusion or lead people to think things that are acceptable to do are not.
English is not my native language, hence the repetitive phrasing, I was just trying to provide some basic assistance to people who might be new posters, of course I know I'm not an approver or contributor, but with 600 approved posts, I'd like to think I have a decent grasp of what's acceptable, that being said, I don't want to turn this into a long argument, so I'll leave it at that
It's never really been formally codified about who can give feedback even though in practice it should really only be Approvers because they're the only ones who can guarantee approval. Lately there's been way too many unhelpful replies and bad advice that have been pushing genuine requests for feedback and Approver responses out of view. So I've updated the topic a bit.
Added for users requesting feedback:
#4 - Don't request feedback for pending posts. Posts still have a chance to be approved at any time while they're still in the modqueue.Added for those giving feedback:
#3 - Feedback should only be given by Approvers as they are the only users who can guarantee approval.
I don't strongly mind if non-Approvers continue to give passing help in certain aspects as long as it's useful: for example, see some of the responses Blank User leaves in this topic. Otherwise, to keep the topic clean to a degree and to avoid misleading users, please don't reply if you have nothing constructive or useful to say. Even though it's a megathread, it's slightly annoying to need to scroll past non-responses like "yeah I think it's good too it should be approved" on the latest pages.
WRS said in forum #442725:
It's never really been formally codified about who can give feedback even though in practice it should really only be Approvers because they're the only ones who can guarantee approval. Lately there's been way too many unhelpful replies and bad advice that have been pushing genuine requests for feedback and Approver responses out of view. So I've updated the topic a bit.
I don't strongly mind if non-Approvers continue to give passing help in certain aspects as long as it's useful: for example, see some of the responses Blank User leaves in this topic. Otherwise, to keep the topic clean to a degree and to avoid misleading users, please don't reply if you have nothing constructive or useful to say. Even though it's a megathread, it's slightly annoying to need to scroll past non-responses like "yeah I think it's good too it should be approved" on the latest pages.
I can understand the frustration to some extent. I might have confused giving constructive feedback with just sharing personal thoughts. I appreciate your patience with this, and I'll definitely keep it in mind in the future
Kuroeffect said in forum #442726:
I can understand the frustration to some extent. I might have confused giving constructive feedback with just sharing personal thoughts. I appreciate your patience with this, and I'll definitely keep it in mind in the future
Basically, when I make comments here, I try my hardest to stay in my lane and only mention things that are basic and that any member familiar with the site could answer. Things like "upvotes don't matter" and "those posts were uploaded by a Contributor." Sometimes I'll point out non-art things like the post not having a source since that's a basic requirement and other Approvers have mentioned skipping posts based on that alone.
The way I see it, answering these questions saves Approvers' time and lets them focus on commenting on the art itself and other things only Approvers can answer (though there's still a risk of spreading misinformation, so you need to make absolutely sure you know what you're talking about and know when to back off).
Good evening, i wanted to ask why did these two post were not approved: post #11463642 and post #11463664 , did i do somethin wrong with the tags or was it somethin else?
Hey there, I'm wondering why these posts weren't approved? A couple of these are several months old admittedly but I don't think I ever asked why there weren't okayed back then. I believe I had enough tags and there fit the content of the art?
post #10149576
post #11462486
post #9454825
post #11309873
post #11334659
All of the other ones from this group were approved not sure why post #10596732 wasn't
post #11446532
All the more explicit illustrations in this series were uploaded by a contributor, but this one was not approved unfortunately.
Anything particularly wrong with it?
Requesting review of post #11469003.