Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? ghostybutt 7

Copyrights

  • ? guilty gear 22k
  • ? ↳ guilty gear strive 10k

Character

  • ? bridget (guilty gear) 4.2k

General

  • ? 1boy 2.0M
  • ? androgyne symbol 2.0k
  • ? aqua eyes 240k
  • ? aqua gloves 2.4k
  • ? bike shorts 61k
  • ? bike shorts under skirt 8.2k
  • ? blonde hair 2.0M
  • ? blush 3.8M
  • ? boots 659k
  • ? bulge 44k
  • ? fingerless gloves 349k
  • ? flag background 1.4k
  • ? gloves 1.8M
  • ? heart 830k
  • ? hood 411k
  • ? hood up 74k
  • ? hooded jacket 83k
  • ? hoodie 185k
  • ? jacket 1.4M
  • ? lgbt pride 761
  • ? long sleeves 2.2M
  • ? looking at viewer 4.6M
  • ? medium hair 578k
  • ? open clothes 702k
  • ? open hoodie 10k
  • ? parted lips 692k
  • ? puffy long sleeves 92k
  • ? puffy sleeves 487k
  • ? simple background 2.6M
  • ? sitting 1.2M
  • ? transgender flag 472
  • ? trap 72k

Meta

  • ? bad id 1.4M
  • ? ↳ bad twitter id 237k
  • ? commentary 2.9M
  • ? english commentary 1.2M
  • ? highres 7.5M

Information

  • ID: 6362204
  • Uploader: KotokoIwanaga »
  • Date: almost 3 years ago
  • Size: 192 KB .jpg (1758x2048) »
  • Source: x.com/ghostybutt/status/1664328049775755264 »
  • Rating: Sensitive
  • Score: 40
  • Favorites: 58
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
This post belongs to a parent (learn more) « hide
post #6362200
post #6362204
Resized to 48% of original (view original)
bridget (guilty gear and 1 more) drawn by ghostybutt

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • happy pride month with bridget 🩷🩵🤍 #guiltygear #GGST

    • ‹ prev Search: ghostybutt next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    UnlimitedShirouWorks
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    I dont exactly like how danbooru doesnt classify bridget as a girl normally but i can accept her being classified as trans when its like explicitly stated she's trans

    -3 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    CitrusC
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    UnlimitedShirouWorks said:

    I dont exactly like how danbooru doesnt classify bridget as a girl normally but i can accept her being classified as trans when its like explicitly stated she's trans

    Danbooru will always go by visuals because this is a website dedicated to keeping track of visual depictions rather than a lore wiki.
    Bridget will always be written as boy until visually depicted as anything other regardless of canon lore status.

    -14 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Incineration
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    CitrusC said:

    Danbooru will always go by visuals because this is a website dedicated to keeping track of visual depictions rather than a lore wiki.

    And yet the otoko no ko tag exists.
    Not to mention Bridget was always depicted as a girl outside of explicit works, but it's somehow different now that she's actually a girl?

    -10 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    blindVigil
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    Incineration said:

    And yet the otoko no ko tag exists.
    Not to mention Bridget was always depicted as a girl outside of explicit works, but it's somehow different now that she's actually a girl?

    What do you mean? We've never tagged Bridget as a girl before Strive, unless it was a confirmed genderswap. Just because people drew her with a girly appearance, which was part of her official design, doesn't mean it wasn't always understood by fans that she was a boy. What, should everyone have been drawing her muscular and manish just because she was canonically male?

    The only thing that's even changed is how she identifies, and she probably doesn't care nearly as much as the people constantly complaining about how she's tagged on a random image aggregator website that most of the userbase just uses to find porn.

    -4 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    CitrusC
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    Incineration said:

    And yet the otoko no ko tag exists.
    Not to mention Bridget was always depicted as a girl outside of explicit works, but it's somehow different now that she's actually a girl?

    Bridget was not depicted as a girl until Strive where she declared to be trans. Even then, due to consistency and disregarding of lore, Bridget is tagged as boy.

    2 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    PikaFan15
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    UnlimitedShirouWorks said:

    I dont exactly like how danbooru doesnt classify bridget as a girl normally but i can accept her being classified as trans when its like explicitly stated she's trans

    Danbooru refused to fix a problem that e621 found a super easy fix for years ago with lore tags (both websites still go by "tag what you see" so that's not an excuse). Once again furries being more progressive than weebs lol. I've just decided that Danbooru will never be as good at tagging as some other booru sites and moved on to just looking at Bridget and how cute she is.

    -15 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    ElMachine
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    PikaFan15 said:

    Danbooru refused to fix a problem that e621 found a super easy fix for years ago with lore tags (both websites still go by "tag what you see" so that's not an excuse). Once again furries being more progressive than weebs lol. I've just decided that Danbooru will never be as good at tagging as some other booru sites and moved on to just looking at Bridget and how cute she is.

    People are hating when you are right, the policy is lacking and creates too much confusion.
    The ability to look up characters by their identity is as negligible to a site's tagging as any other identifier like fantasy races and alternative outfits.
    E621 has more issues but I look at Philomena and Furbooru and Derpibooru tagging standards as incredible.

    8 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    WhatWillYouDoWithoutMeOp
    almost 3 years ago
    [hidden]

    ElMachine said:

    People are hating when you are right, the policy is lacking and creates too much confusion.
    The ability to look up characters by their identity is as negligible to a site's tagging as any other identifier like fantasy races and alternative outfits.
    E621 has more issues but I look at Philomena and Furbooru and Derpibooru tagging standards as incredible.

    People are probably hating because the comment was unnecessarily vitriolic.

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Discord96
    over 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    PikaFan15 said:

    Danbooru refused to fix a problem that e621 found a super easy fix for years ago with lore tags (both websites still go by "tag what you see" so that's not an excuse). Once again furries being more progressive than weebs lol. I've just decided that Danbooru will never be as good at tagging as some other booru sites and moved on to just looking at Bridget and how cute she is.

    Lore is established, not declared

    -10 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    gratman
    over 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    Please stop mistagging this post. There is visible bulge.

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    lunanova
    over 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    gratman said:

    Please stop mistagging this post. There is visible bulge.

    Please refresh your memory on Danbooru's stance on tagging Bridget's gender. If it's explicitly stated that she's a trans girl, then it's 1girl. The trans flag seems pretty damn explicit to me.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    nonamethanks
    over 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    lunanova said:

    Please refresh your memory on Danbooru's stance on tagging Bridget's gender. If it's explicitly stated that she's a trans girl, then it's 1girl. The trans flag seems pretty damn explicit to me.

    Wrong. That only applies to rating:g. In this post there's a visible dick.

    Updated by nonamethanks over 2 years ago

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    verifiably
    over 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    nonamethanks said:

    Wrong. That only applies to rating:g. In this post there's a visible dick.

    Where's this stated?

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    blindVigil
    over 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    verifiably said:

    Where's this stated?

    forum #222668

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    helljumperhelljumper
    about 2 years ago
    [hidden]

    WhatWillYouDoWithoutMeOp said:

    People are probably hating because the comment was unnecessarily vitriolic.

    Not unnecessarily

    -8 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link

    Leave a comment

    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /