Every single post by this artist is completely ai generated, atleast his newer stuff. It's not even hidden; or traced over. Look at the hands or hair OR ANY LINE in any of his posts. It's a disgrace. Not assisted COMPLETELY generated.

sonjyihm said in comment #2599981:

Every single post by this artist is completely ai generated, atleast his newer stuff. It's not even hidden; or traced over. Look at the hands or hair OR ANY LINE in any of his posts. It's a disgrace. Not assisted COMPLETELY generated.

ai shouldnt have a place here no matter what. doesnt matter in what capacity. no real artist uses ai and no one creating ai images ahould have their trash posted here.

this "klopsiak" clown is not an artist.

FapmasterStench said in comment #2599991:

ai shouldnt have a place here no matter what. doesnt matter in what capacity. no real artist uses ai and no one creating ai images ahould have their trash posted here.

this "klopsiak" clown is not an artist.

mass-flag maybe to make people notice? or is it useless because mods cover each other up?

TheBigBen said in comment #2600093:

mass-flag maybe to make people notice? or is it useless because mods cover each other up?

The uploader isn't a mod.

Also, one of the AI tags needs to be removed. It can't be both AI-assisted and AI-generated. And if it is fully AI-generated, it needs to be flagged. No one's bothered to do that yet.

Blank_User said in comment #2600103:

The uploader isn't a mod.

Also, one of the AI tags needs to be removed. It can't be both AI-assisted and AI-generated. And if it is fully AI-generated, it needs to be flagged. No one's bothered to do that yet.

What surprises me the most is that Danbooru is supposed to be a place for "high-quality uploads" (with a very subjective quality check system but that's another story). Is THIS a high-quality upload? Okay, alright, at the very least it has to be tagged properly (and deleted?). But even after getting flagged some of klopsiak's posts either get manually approved (what???) or disapproved (disinterest)'d (synonym for 'I don't care'). Makes an impression something's fishy.

I'm a casual user, mostly a "lurker" so...

Maybe I simply don't understand something?

As a lurker myself, I would rather have someone reputable claim that this is AI-Generated than fresh accounts that have been created 2 days ago.

Adding this to the other post:

AI-generated. I'm not the only one speaking of this. #slopsiak (1 day ago)

really feels more like a personal vendetta than actual evidence of why this is AI-Generated.

Given the classical shading dots and hair brush, as well as the reputable history of Klopsiak on Twitter, where you can see them getting better over the years, seems to me that this is not generated.

After a few hours looking at klopsiak's artwork, I really don't know what to think. If I look at art from 2020 to early 2024, it all looks pretty natural and gradually improves to a level that seems consistent with their current art. Art on their SFW twitter account doesn't look AI, and is stylistically consistent with their earlier work. But if I look just at their NSFW twitter account it has a very different (and itself internally super-consistent) style that looks much more AI-y. There's a lot of "melty hair", fully rendered art with very chaotic linework, and crisp text over a much fuzzier art piece. There's also just some weird stylistic motifs on the second style, like use of double-line brushes and dot patterns, that very rarely appear on klopsiak's main twitter? It's almost like he's a legit artist, but for his NSFW account he just AI generates art and scribbles over it a bit? Very weird.

The weirdest thing is that is that the biggest things that make this look AI generated (e.g. melty hair), are only actually common with AI image generators up to around 2023 (e.g. stable-diffusion v1). But klopsiak's work back then definitely doesn't look AI generated, and those generators also basically can't make hands at all. So either: 1) klopsiak is AI generating these images, but choosing to use an old AI style that has obvious tells or 2) klopsiak is hand-drawing these images, and choosing to use a style that looks AI-y? Maybe klopsiak just hasn't noticed that this style looks AI generated? There's no other reason to choose such a suspicious style.