This post has already been disapproved by 6 moderators.
I wanted to understand ... Why...
Posted under General
This post has already been disapproved by 6 moderators.
I wanted to understand ... Why...
I'm guessing size, photo and the tilt, but a lot of similar stuff from the same artist is already up.
post #4027941
NormanTheMormon said:
I'm guessing size, photo and the tilt, but a lot of similar stuff from the same artist is already up.
post #4027941
Yeah, for me the issue is that it's too small + a photo. If there's a higher version I would approve that.
Also to link to posts you don't need the double brackets. Just do post #4027941.
need advice
bad anatomy of pov?
post #4037111
I take it it was too uncreative (11 approvers apparently didn't like it enough)
post #4044048
I'm genuinely curious about this one and what's off about it. Is it the body structure of the torso? That's the only thing I could think of.
post #4042936
Same with this one. There was an md5 mismatch, but that's been resolved. Is it an anatomy issue again? Or something else?
post #4043498
What's off about the eyes on this one?
Thanks!
post #4044882 (free fanbox version) was not approved and Pixiv post #4045467 was approved. Both identical in size with a larger file size on the fanbox reward.
Was there a problem with it I didn't catch? Perhaps more thorough tagging on the parent, but I shouldn't guess.
Edit: Thanks for giving it a second look.
Updated by enty73
ajkeene99 said:
post #4044048
I'm genuinely curious about this one and what's off about it. Is it the body structure of the torso? That's the only thing I could think of.post #4042936
Same with this one. There was an md5 mismatch, but that's been resolved. Is it an anatomy issue again? Or something else?post #4043498
What's off about the eyes on this one?Thanks!
First one: Long arm and I guess the way her stomach is drawn makes it worse overall. Kinda looks like a weird bulge to me.
Second: Her breasts look like some attached balls. The artist tried to make them look like they´re pushed up, but the effect is kinda weird.
Third: Shes squinting. Her body is fine, but her eyes are the dealbreaker.
g3gen said:
post #4044882 (free fanbox version) was not approved and Pixiv post #4045467 was approved. Both identical in size with a larger file size on the fanbox reward.
Was there a problem with it I didn't catch? Perhaps more thorough tagging on the parent, but I shouldn't guess.
Also wondered the same for my own post that I uploaded almost half a day before the pixiv post appeared
post #3943310
I think they're cute...
aLoAlo said:
Also wondered the same for my own post that I uploaded almost half a day before the pixiv post appeared
The twitter version ist most likely not going to be approved, if a superior version is uploaded, even afterwards. If you upload from twitter there´s always a chance, that it´s inferior to the pixiv version and if it´s not approved before the pixiv version is uploaded (or any other superior version), then it´s most likely to be not approved at all.
Guaro1238 said:
First one: Long arm and I guess the way her stomach is drawn makes it worse overall. Kinda looks like a weird bulge to me.
Second: Her breasts look like some attached balls. The artist tried to make them look like they´re pushed up, but the effect is kinda weird.
Third: Shes squinting. Her body is fine, but her eyes are the dealbreaker.
Fair enough, thanks for the feedback!
@HammyHydra As I understand it, the first one does not pass in terms of quality. Sometimes even the best works don't get approved. The second is discussed above.
Dolmatov said:
@HammyHydra As I understand it, the first one does not pass in terms of quality. Sometimes even the best works don't get approved. The second is discussed above.
For me at least it's more that it's sourceless and there's no artist tag, so I have no idea where it comes from.
post #4048245
Did my smol portrait of nezuko really get disapproved?! I can't... yeah, no the reason is obvious but... should it? I guess so but... something to think about. And what if they got autoupscaled and you had a choice to see the original, like what they do to highres in reverse? I think, nah, it's just too avant-garde for right now... or is it?!