FGO requests

Ylimegirl said:

Slightly related, I'm guessing no tears will be shed if I were to nuke the list of fate series alternate costumes wiki (along with a good chunk of the gentag wikis it links to)?

That wiki seems to have emerged from topic #20626, back when Fate/Grand Order's wiki looked like this, but in that time it was never linked in any other wiki. It seems @Benit149 wanted to discuss whether or not this wiki had any use to begin with, as otherwise, not counting evazion's edit, since its creation only DanbooruBot has edited it up until today.

Since I made this post, Ylime has responded to the topic, the first to do so.

BUR #41191 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication gareth_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> gareth_(fate)
create implication gareth_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> gareth_(fate)
create implication gareth_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> gareth_(fate)
create implication gareth_(tour_outfit)_(fate) -> gareth_(fate)
create implication gareth_(camelot_lesson)_(fate) -> gareth_(fate)
create implication gareth_(animejapan_2022)_(fate) -> gareth_(fate)
create implication gareth_(swimsuit_saber)_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> gareth_(swimsuit_saber)_(fate)
create implication gareth_(swimsuit_saber)_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> gareth_(swimsuit_saber)_(fate)
create implication gareth_(swimsuit_saber)_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> gareth_(swimsuit_saber)_(fate)
create implication gareth_(over_the_rough_waves)_(fate) -> gareth_(swimsuit_saber)_(fate)

gareth implications

The bulk update request #41126 (forum #355725) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #41142 (forum #355802) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

Ylimegirl said:

BUR #41172 has been rejected.

create alias emiya_alter -> emiya_alter_(fate)

Alternatively.

Well, emiya shirou has no qualifier... Also the subtags need implication.

The bulk update request #41171 (forum #355962) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #41172 (forum #355963) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.

HeyaHowYaDoin said:

BUR #41191 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication gareth_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> gareth_(fate)
create implication gareth_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> gareth_(fate)
create implication gareth_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> gareth_(fate)
create implication gareth_(tour_outfit)_(fate) -> gareth_(fate)
create implication gareth_(camelot_lesson)_(fate) -> gareth_(fate)
create implication gareth_(animejapan_2022)_(fate) -> gareth_(fate)
create implication gareth_(swimsuit_saber)_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> gareth_(swimsuit_saber)_(fate)
create implication gareth_(swimsuit_saber)_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> gareth_(swimsuit_saber)_(fate)
create implication gareth_(swimsuit_saber)_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> gareth_(swimsuit_saber)_(fate)
create implication gareth_(over_the_rough_waves)_(fate) -> gareth_(swimsuit_saber)_(fate)

gareth implications

Maybe just deprecate gareth_(swimsuit_saber)_(fate) and imply the rest to the main tag, they all look pretty different.

nonamethanks said:

Maybe just deprecate gareth_(swimsuit_saber)_(fate) and imply the rest to the main tag, they all look pretty different.

forum #350480 and that thread as a whole, though I think you already found that topic.

BUR #41382 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication miyamoto_musashi_(dream_portrait)_(fate) -> miyamoto_musashi_(swimsuit_berserker)_(fate)
remove implication miyamoto_musashi_(dream_portrait)_(fate) -> miyamoto_musashi_(fate)

Shares the same side bun as all her swimsuit ascensions. Related: forum #356915

nonamethanks said:

Maybe just deprecate gareth_(swimsuit_saber)_(fate) and imply the rest to the main tag, they all look pretty different.

I’ve stated my stance clearly as being against doing that in the other thread

BUR #41505 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create alias musashibo_benkei_(under_the_same_sky)_(fate) -> musashibou_benkei_(under_the_same_sky)_(fate)

Missed this when I submitted forum #320644.

Ylimegirl said:

BUR #41382 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication miyamoto_musashi_(dream_portrait)_(fate) -> miyamoto_musashi_(swimsuit_berserker)_(fate)
remove implication miyamoto_musashi_(dream_portrait)_(fate) -> miyamoto_musashi_(fate)

Shares the same side bun as all her swimsuit ascensions. Related: forum #356915

Speaking of this, there's also post #4619535 (gelbooru #6245096, banned post). I assume it's a custom variant of miyamoto_musashi_(swimsuit_berserker)_(fate) because I can't find any subcostume tag that looks like this.

nonamethanks said:

Speaking of this, there's also post #4619535 (gelbooru #6245096, banned post). I assume it's a custom variant of miyamoto_musashi_(swimsuit_berserker)_(fate) because I can't find any subcostume tag that looks like this.

Yeah that's a custom variant. Could arguably be tagged with her second ascension because of the bun cover color but that's probably stretching it a bit.

The bulk update request #41505 (forum #357308) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #41382 (forum #356916) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

BUR #41598 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create alias jeanne_d'arc_(distant_pilgrimage)_(fate) -> laeticia_(distant_pilgrimage)_(fate)

This is canonically actually Laeticia. (The utility of the Laeticia versus Jeanne tags is another topic I guess. One of these days I'll get to the Jeanne umbrella tag. Right before I get to the Artoria umbrella tag.)

BUR #41600 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

rename aesc_(9th_anniversary)_(fate) -> aesc_(exhibition_attire)_(fate)

I uh. Can't check because all three posts with this tag (post #7680617 post #7680620 post #7666243) are banned but I'm guessing this is where the tag is trying to point to?

BUR #41649 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create alias jeanne_d'arc_alter_(violet_angel)_(fate) -> jeanne_d'arc_alter_(violette_vengeur)_(fate)

Per forum #357951
Proper romanization for the name of the costume ヴィヨレットヴァンジェール
ヴィヨレット -> the katakana spells like the French pronunciation rather than the English pronunciation of "Violet", thus spelt violette to make it apparent it's French (it's also the female form of the word)
ヴァンジェール -> Vengeur, French word for Avenger (albeit male form of the word).

It's botched grammar, as expected of TM trying to do anything French, but a botched French version of "violet avenger" seems like what they were going for for a costume of a French Avenger in a violet dress.

BUR #41669 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication tamamo_cat_(first_ascension)_(fate) -> tamamo_cat_(fate)
create implication tamamo_cat_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> tamamo_cat_(fate)
create implication tamamo_cat_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> tamamo_cat_(fate)

Tamamo Cat’s ascensions are Tamamo Cat.