imply superman -> clark_kent (brainstorming a policy for superheroes vs civilian identities)

Posted under Tags

This is why I was proposing the hierarchy. As we know with superheroes, many different people become the same hero.

Batman
Bruce Wayne
Dick Grayson
Jean-Paul Valley/Azrael
James Gordon
Terry Mcginnis
Damian Wayne
Jason Todd
Tim Drake
Thomas Wayne
Jace Fox
Kal-ElClark Kent
Alfred pennyworth

Nightwing
Dick Grayson
Kal-ElClark Kent
Jason Todd
Lor ZodChris Kent
Kara Zor-LKaren Starr/Paige Stetler
Cheyenne Freemont
Alphonse Sapienza
Bruce Wayne
Terry Mcginnis
Damian Wayne

In regards to post #11264629:

Supergirl
Kara In-ZeKara Kent

Outside of the suit, she's Kara Kent. If she were in the suit, the Kara Kent tag would be removed.

I'm not sure how the tags work on the back end, but if it's possible to link them and have multiple parents for child tags, then that's what I'm saying. As for the costumes, I think the best option is to make them individual General tags instead of linked to the character. Or they could be linked to the character, either option works. Also I don't think it's necessary to designate a "civilian" version of the character since their alter ego is already the civilian version.

This is me thinking out loud, not really proposing anything. You don't really need to do both civilian->hero AND hero->civilian implications. Batman (Bruce Wayne) and Bruce Wayne (Batman) are literally identical tags. Just cutting that reduces post #11265493 to this:

Note: You could also do it the other way around where you cut Bruce Wayne (Batman) and keep Batman (Bruce Wayne). This is just a demonstration.

Now obviously expecting taggers to get this without implications is a nontrivial ask. An alias for Batman (Bruce Wayne) -> Bruce Wayne (Batman) would help, but it's easy to imagine them just forgetting to tag Batman afterwards. It'd become a common mistake like solo multiple_views or upper_body portrait. Fairly easy to garden for though, bruce_wayne_(batman) -batman.

DerBurgerFuhrer said in forum #436092:

At the same time though, can you use a child tag without the parent tag? For example, in cases where it's Spider-Man going to school and not as Spider-Man could you use the Peter Parker

No.

DerBurgerFuhrer said in forum #436283:

This is why I was proposing the hierarchy. As we know with superheroes, many different people become the same hero.

The hierarchy you're proposing would result in every post of Tim Drake also being tagged as Batman, jsyk. It's the same way every post featuring Hatsune Miku (Append) is also tagged Hatsune Miku.

I'm not sure how the tags work on the back end, but if it's possible to link them and have multiple parents for child tags, then that's what I'm saying.

You can have multiple parents for child tags, but it will result in the same tag appearing in the list twice, see posts with Project Voltage as an example of this.

As for the costumes, I think the best option is to make them individual General tags instead of linked to the character. Or they could be linked to the character, either option works.

So which is it? Are you in support of general costume tag (used for costumes worn by multiple characters, a la school uniforms) or Chartags linked to the character (a la gacha game variants)? Having both would usually be redundant. Personally, my position in forum #432977 hasn't changed, which would be case by case basis with the civillian name being the parent tag.

At the end of the day it sounds like you're imagining a system wherein tag implications only exist for pretty nesting on the side if both tags are added to a post, which is not how tags on Danbooru work. The pretty nesting only exists as a visual aid for the viewer, and is a result of the implications automatically adding the parent tags.


PersonalFowl said in forum #436284:

This is me thinking out loud, not really proposing anything. You don't really need to do both civilian->hero AND hero->civilian implications. Batman (Bruce Wayne) and Bruce Wayne (Batman) are literally identical tags.

Sounds like you agree with the basic proposal outlined in the original post, then.

PersonalFowl said in forum #436284:

This is me thinking out loud, not really proposing anything. You don't really need to do both civilian->hero AND hero->civilian implications. Batman (Bruce Wayne) and Bruce Wayne (Batman) are literally identical tags. Just cutting that reduces post #11265493 to this:

Yeah, that's just my original proposal. The problem is that while it solves a host of issues with the current system, it leaves behind the major complaint from this thread, which is for example that you cannot reliably search for Spider-Man at once - we'd have to constantly mantain all of these "generic" shared costume tags separately from the characters, which is a lot of work.

I have updated the opening BUR to only have superman, since he's one of the most popular superheroes and he's relatively simple to deal with.
I will let another week or two pass for more discussion, and then I will approve it, and will submit a small batch of other BURs for other superheroes so that we can start our plan of attack to fix these tags in steps.

If you haven't voted, please vote on that BUR with the understanding that future BURs for the characters mentioned in this thread will have their own voting phases and time to argue about them.

I might start for the most controversial ones first so that we get the worst problems out of the way first.

I've opted to not suggest clark kent (superman) as the main tag because I think that it's pedantic, given that it's not even something like Batman where people mistake Grayson or Thomas Wayne for Bruce all the time, and with the understanding that other supermen, such as Bizarro or Ultraman should be fully separated.
This might be worth revisiting if we find that somehow we're getting mistags, but then again it will be as simple as renaming the superhero tag, so it's not a big deal for now.

I'm still unsure about the superhero costume problem. I am considering just letting Spider-Man and Batman get double-implications because of their particular nature, as exceptions.

I also noticed we don't have list_of superhero tags, and they're currently all around the place in their own subcopyrights. I created a draft at list of marvel characters and list of dc comics characters, plus list of superheroes which points at those two wikis, so it can be expanded with more franchises such as Invincible (Series), which will have to go through the same treatment. Feel free to chip in and expand then. For now I just moved the huge lists from Marvel and DC Comics, but the list of characters is all over the place in subtags.

Ylimegirl said in forum #436285:

No.

The hierarchy you're proposing would result in every post of Tim Drake also being tagged as Batman, jsyk. It's the same way every post featuring Hatsune Miku (Append) is also tagged Hatsune Miku.

You can have multiple parents for child tags, but it will result in the same tag appearing in the list twice, see posts with Project Voltage as an example of this.

So which is it? Are you in support of general costume tag (used for costumes worn by multiple characters, a la school uniforms) or Chartags linked to the character (a la gacha game variants)? Having both would usually be redundant. Personally, my position in forum #432977 hasn't changed, which would be case by case basis with the civillian name being the parent tag.

At the end of the day it sounds like you're imagining a system wherein tag implications only exist for pretty nesting on the side if both tags are added to a post, which is not how tags on Danbooru work. The pretty nesting only exists as a visual aid for the viewer, and is a result of the implications automatically adding the parent tags.

Yeah, which is why I was asking what our limitations are. I like the pretty nesting, it makes everything feel neat and organized. My main issue right now is just how Supergirl has just no disambiguation.

I must've missed your post initially, but I think I can agree with your proposal.

BUR #60033 is pending approval.

mass update bruce_wayne -batman -> char:bruce_wayne_(civilian) -bruce_wayne
mass update bruce_wayne batman -> batman -bruce_wayne
create alias batman -> bruce_wayne_(batman)
create implication bruce_wayne_(batman) -> bruce_wayne
create implication bruce_wayne_(civilian) -> bruce_wayne

Next is Bruce Wayne, since he's already a more complex case than Superman.
Please don't propose other BURs in this topic, we gotta deal with these one by one or it'll just turn into chaos.

This is the "easy" part of the hard case of batman.
The hard part of the hard part is that we also have Batman (Absolute DC) and Bruce Wayne (Absolute DC), which is a small version of the mess we have with Marvel and the various peter parkers.

We also have Superboy-Prime which is distinct from Superboy in that he's supposed to be an alternate version of Clark Kent. We'll deal with him later.

How do we deal with alternate versions of what is obviously the same character? More BURs to follow.

There are four ways we could approach these tags.
I am deliberately excluding double implications of each tag to bruce_wayne_(absolute_dc)/bruce_wayne_(batman)/bruce_wayne_(civilian) at the same time because it will result in a geometric explosion of implication chains and will turn the sidebar and this whole deal into a nightmare.


First Option (1):

post #11354376:

post #11354098:

Upsides: limited nesting and amount of tags
Downsides: hard to search and understand. It's not intuitive that you need to add a modifier chartag just to search for absolute DC civilian bruce wayne. There's no point in this if we already have Absolute Batman/Absolute DC as modifiers.


Second Option (2):

post #11354376:

post #11354098:

Upsides: absolute bruce wayne in one place
Downsides: we can't search for all of bruce wayne batman or all of bruce wayne civilian. I think this is a non-starter.


Third Option (3):

post #11354376:

post #11354098:

Upsides: easy to search for and understand. All of batman / all of the civilian in one place.
Downsides: a lot of nesting, and we still need to use Absolute DC to find all versions of absolute bruce wayne.


Fourth Option (4):

post #11354376:

post #11354098:

Upsides: absolute bruce wayne in one place
Downsides: ignores the existence of something like Marvel Rivals or Multiversus: https://multiversus.fandom.com/wiki/Variants#Superman


Option 1 is confusing, it clashes with how we do things in the rest of the site, so I don't think it's viable if we're trying to actually fix these tags and make them more consistent with everything else.
Option 2 doesn't work either because we don't want to have to use N tags to just see Bruce Wayne as Batman or as a civilian.
Option 3 is going to result in a proliferation of a lot of subtags, turning superhero franchises into something closer to gachas than the rest of our copyrights. I am not a fan of this.
Option 4 to me is the more sensible option.

I am going to propose separate BURs for option 3 and option 4, including Superman since his main case was covered by the opening BUR.
Personally I'm for Option 4, as it's the one that will result in less of a headache while still offering full search capability for those who care. For example, absolute_batman bruce_wayne or absolute_batman bruce_wayne_(civilian) will give you everything you want, and you'd still need to do the first search in any case. It's also the closest to the status quo, because only a few subseries currently are using chartags like this.

Feel free to argue or counterpropose BURs regarding Bruce Wayne/Superman (and only them, please. Don't derail the thread).

Updated by nonamethanks

BUR #60034 is pending approval.

rename batman_(absolute_dc) -> bruce_wayne_(absolute_dc)_(batman)
create implication bruce_wayne_(absolute_dc)_(batman) -> bruce_wayne_(batman)
rename bruce_wayne_(absolute_dc) -> bruce_wayne_(absolute_dc)_(civilian)
create implication bruce_wayne_(absolute_dc)_(civilian) -> bruce_wayne_(civilian)
create implication superman_(absolute_dc) -> superman

Option 3 of forum #441545. Note that if we keep these, it will invite the creation of a myriad other superman/civilian-clark-kent-specific subtags for other copyrights such as Multiversus, Man Of Steel, My Adventures With Superman, etc. It's a pretty bad slippery slope.

BUR #60035 is pending approval.

mass update batman_(absolute_dc) -> bruce_wayne_(batman) absolute_batman -batman_(absolute_dc)
mass update bruce_wayne_(absolute_dc) -> bruce_wayne_(civilian) absolute_batman -bruce_wayne_(absolute_dc)
mass update superman_(absolute_dc) -> superman absolute_superman -superman_(absolute_dc)

Option 4 of forum #441545. This would be my preferred option, and we'll say that if there's subseries with multiple suits AND many posts to the point where it's hard to search for a single suit among many (such as perhaps Spider-Man, Iron-Man, and obviously Marvel Rivals and other skin-based copyrights) then costume tags can be created for them (and only them).

1 2 3 4 5